These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 31455939

  • 41. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients.
    Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Kenney SP, Devoe LD.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 9464724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. When Hadlock's methodology to determine menstrual age and weight are used in combination in obstetrical calculation programs, the results are not valid at term.
    Cadkin AV.
    J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Mar; 15(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 8919512
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Danon D, Hadar E, Gabbay-Benziv R.
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight.
    Mongelli M, Gardosi J.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Jan; 75(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 8560993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Prediction of large for gestational age by various sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas-which should we use?
    Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Hadar E, Gabbay-Benziv R.
    J Perinatol; 2017 May; 37(5):513-517. PubMed ID: 28151496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, Bernard C, Cambourieu D, Flamant C, Gascoin G, Gaudineau A, Grangé G, Houfflin-Debarge V, Langer B, Malan V, Marcorelles P, Nizard J, Perrotin F, Salomon L, Senat MV, Serry A, Tessier V, Truffert P, Tsatsaris V, Arnaud C, Carbonne B.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. [Evaluation of the palpation method of estimation of fetal weight according to the Johnson's method in authors' own modification].
    Nienartowicz A, Sych Z.
    Ginekol Pol; 1979 Jun; 50(6):487-94. PubMed ID: 478336
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. [Usefulness of selected ultrasonographic methods for evaluation of fetal weight in twins].
    Jastrzebski A, Poreba R, Sirko I, Zieliński T, Kucharzewski M.
    Wiad Lek; 2002 Jun; 55(5-6):264-9. PubMed ID: 12235691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
    Shmueli A, Salman L, Hadar E, Aviram A, Bardin R, Ashwal E, Gabbay-Benziv R.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. An adjustable fetal weight standard for twins: a statistical modeling study.
    Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Lei X, Sun L, Yu H, Cheng W.
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul 03; 13():159. PubMed ID: 26141190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term.
    Lanowski JS, Lanowski G, Schippert C, Drinkut K, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2017 Mar 03; 77(3):276-283. PubMed ID: 28392581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Five-dimensional long bones biometry for estimation of femur length and fetal weight at term compared to two-dimensional ultrasound: a pilot study.
    Laban M, Alanwar AA, Etman MK, Elsokkary MS, Elkotb AM, Hasanien AS, KhalafAllah AE, Noah NM.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Aug 03; 31(15):2036-2042. PubMed ID: 28750591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Women with Diet Controlled Gestational Diabetes.
    Husslein H, Worda C, Leipold H, Szalay S.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2012 Feb 03; 72(2):144-148. PubMed ID: 25284831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in predicting actual birth weight in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria.
    Ugwu EO, Udealor PC, Dim CC, Obi SN, Ozumba BC, Okeke DO, Agu PU.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014 Feb 03; 17(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 24714001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low-risk population.
    Mongelli M, Gardosi J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov 03; 6(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 8590205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Normal fetal growth evaluated by longitudinal ultrasound examinations.
    Larsen T, Petersen S, Greisen G, Larsen JF.
    Early Hum Dev; 1990 Oct 03; 24(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 2265597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately.
    Caravello JW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN, Devoe LD.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr 03; 89(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 9083307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Prediction of Small for Gestational Age: Accuracy of Different Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation Formulas.
    Gabbay-Benziv R, Aviram A, Bardin R, Ashwal E, Melamed N, Hiersch L, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y, Hadar E.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2016 Apr 03; 40(3):205-213. PubMed ID: 26942906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.