These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
162 related items for PubMed ID: 31486197
1. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help? Bicchierai G, Nori J, De Benedetto D, Boeri C, Vanzi E, Bianchi S, Kaur Gill M, Cirone D, Miele V. Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A feasibility study. Waldherr C, Berclaz G, Altermatt HJ, Cerny P, Keller P, Dietz U, Buser K, Ciriolo M, Sonnenschein MJ. Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 26385802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple Angulated Mammography Reconstructions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Diagnosis of Microcalcifications - Added Value to Standard Stack Reconstructions and Synthesized Mammography. Neubauer J, Neubauer C, Wicklein J, Mertelmeier T, Windfuhr-Blum M, Langer M. Rofo; 2018 May; 190(5):433-440. PubMed ID: 29390228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions. Dobrosavljević A, Rakić S, Nikoli B, Raznatović SJ, Dikić SD, Milosević Z, Jurisić A, Skrobić M. Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. Wenkel E, Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz WA, Janka R. Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Stehouwer BL, Merckel LG, Verkooijen HM, Peters NH, Mann RM, Duvivier KM, Mali WP, Peeters PH, Veldhuis WB, van den Bosch MA. Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography. Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S, Thomas A, Fischer T, Slowinski T, Schmidt W, Degenhardt F. Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of MRI of microcalcification lesions to determine the indication for stereotactic mammotome biopsy. Kikuchi M, Tanino H, Kosaka Y, Sengoku N, Yamashita K, Minatani N, Nishimiya H, Waraya M, Katoh H, Enomoto T, Kajita S, Woodhams R, Watanabe M. Anticancer Res; 2014 Nov; 34(11):6749-53. PubMed ID: 25368286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Radiographic image magnification as quality control of microcalcification imaging within the scope of histopathological control of breast biopsy tissue]. Grunert JH, Flemming P, Borchert B, Farber A, Gmelin E. Rofo; 2000 Jan; 172(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 10719466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies]. Fischmann A, Pietsch-Breitfeld B, Müller-Schimpfle M, Siegmann K, Wersebe A, Rothenberger-Janzen K, Claussen CD, Janzen J. Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Our Radiological Experience on B3 Lesions: Correlation Between Mammographic and MRI Findings With Histologic Definitive Result. Santucci D, Faiella E, Calabrese A, Favale L, Zobel BB, de Felice C. Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):e643-e653. PubMed ID: 31377083 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A cluster of microcalcifications: women with high risk for breast cancer versus other women. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Breast Cancer; 2009 Oct; 16(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 19350360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [CME ultrasound diagnosis 28. Breast with conspicuous palpation findings]. Tuma J. Praxis (Bern 1994); 2009 Jun 10; 98(12):667-9. PubMed ID: 19513981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming]. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Funke M, Hermann KP, Grabbe E. Radiologe; 2002 Apr 10; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Wang XY, Kang LK, Lan CY. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014 Apr 10; 35(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 25118483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathologic correlation of residual mammographic microcalcifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Adrada BE, Huo L, Lane DL, Arribas EM, Resetkova E, Yang W. Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr 10; 22(4):1111-7. PubMed ID: 25287438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI. Wengert GJ, Pipan F, Almohanna J, Bickel H, Polanec S, Kapetas P, Clauser P, Pinker K, Helbich TH, Baltzer PAT. Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar 10; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Gufler H, Buitrago-Téllez CH, Madjar H, Allmann KH, Uhl M, Rohr-Reyes A. Acta Radiol; 2000 May 10; 41(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10866074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Kim SY, Kim HY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Yoon JH. Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep 10; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammotome biopsy under ultrasound control in the diagnostics and treatment of nodular breast lesions - own experience. Kibil W, Hodorowicz-Zaniewska D, Kulig J. Pol Przegl Chir; 2012 May 10; 84(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 22763299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]