These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
79 related items for PubMed ID: 3150283
21. Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Fruits TJ, Duncanson MG, Miller RC. Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 9545909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of mode of conditioning treatment on efficacy of dentin bonding. Uno S, Finger WJ. Oper Dent; 1996 Oct; 21(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 8957913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Dentin adhesive resins: new application and clinical results in conservative therapy (1: Cavex Clearfil adhesive resin)]. Loria P, Chiappe M, Bruzzone G, Spina G. Parodontol Stomatol (Nuova); 1984 Oct; 23(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 6241306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Post and core retention with different cements. Leary JM, Holmes DC, Johnson WT. Gen Dent; 1995 Jun; 43(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 8941732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Dentin bond strength of Dyract Cem. Martin R, Paul SJ, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9545917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy of the dentin bonding agents. Part II. A comparison of glass ionomer cement with dentin bonding agents. Leinfelder KF, Russell CM, Thornton RJ, Cowen RG, Walker CK. J Ala Dent Assoc; 1986 Feb; 70(2):15-22. PubMed ID: 3519722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Oper Dent; 1995 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Dentin bonding. Comparative study of 4 systems]. Scherman L. Chir Dent Fr; 1988 Dec 08; 58(450):37-42. PubMed ID: 3151883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A 5-year report on a enamel-dentinal bonding agent and microfilled resin system. Ferrari M, Bertelli E, Finger W. Quintessence Int; 1993 Oct 08; 24(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 8121989 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up. van Dijken JW. J Dent; 2005 Aug 08; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Early clinical evaluation of four new bonding resins used for conservative restoration of cervical erosion lesions. Jordan RE, Suzuki M. J Can Dent Assoc; 1993 Jan 08; 59(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 8443708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system--results at three years. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Oper Dent; 2001 Jan 08; 26(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11203771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The clinical performance of a new adhesive resin system in class V and IV restorations. Duke ES, Robbins JW, Trevino D. Compendium; 1994 Jul 08; 15(7):852, 854, 856 passim; quiz 864. PubMed ID: 7728815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post. Abo El-Ela OA, Atta OA, El-Mowafy O. J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun 08; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV. Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct 08; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability. Hannig M, Friedrichs C. Oper Dent; 2001 Oct 08; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Bond strengths of dentinal bonding systems to enamel and dentin. McGuckin RS, Powers JM, Li L. Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov 08; 25(11):791-6. PubMed ID: 7568685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]