These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches. Bakrania K, Yates T, Rowlands AV, Esliger DW, Bunnewell S, Sanders J, Davies M, Khunti K, Edwardson CL. PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Calibration and Validation of a Wrist- and Hip-Worn Actigraph Accelerometer in 4-Year-Old Children. Johansson E, Larisch LM, Marcus C, Hagströmer M. PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162436. PubMed ID: 27617962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults. Sasaki JE, Hickey AM, Staudenmayer JW, John D, Kent JA, Freedson PS. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 26673129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. CHAP-child: an open source method for estimating sit-to-stand transitions and sedentary bout patterns from hip accelerometers among children. Carlson JA, Ridgers ND, Nakandala S, Zablocki R, Tuz-Zahra F, Bellettiere J, Hibbing PR, Steel C, Jankowska MM, Rosenberg DE, Greenwood-Hickman MA, Zou J, LaCroix AZ, Kumar A, Natarajan L. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Aug 26; 19(1):109. PubMed ID: 36028890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Examination of different accelerometer cut-points for assessing sedentary behaviors in children. Kim Y, Lee JM, Peters BP, Gaesser GA, Welk GJ. PLoS One; 2014 Aug 26; 9(4):e90630. PubMed ID: 24699259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The backwards comparability of wrist worn GENEActiv and waist worn ActiGraph accelerometer estimates of sedentary time in children. Boddy LM, Noonan RJ, Rowlands AV, Hurter L, Knowles ZR, Fairclough SJ. J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Jul 26; 22(7):814-820. PubMed ID: 30803818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Accelerometer wear-site detection: When one site does not suit all, all of the time. Rowlands AV, Olds TS, Bakrania K, Stanley RM, Parfitt G, Eston RG, Yates T, Fraysse F. J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Apr 26; 20(4):368-372. PubMed ID: 28117147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. "What Is a Step?" Differences in How a Step Is Detected among Three Popular Activity Monitors That Have Impacted Physical Activity Research. John D, Morton A, Arguello D, Lyden K, Bassett D. Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr 15; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29662048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Validity of wrist worn accelerometers and comparability between hip and wrist placement sites in estimating physical activity behaviour in preschool children. Hislop J, Palmer N, Anand P, Aldin T. Physiol Meas; 2016 Oct 15; 37(10):1701-1714. PubMed ID: 27653188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Adapted Sojourn Models to Estimate Activity Intensity in Youth: A Suite of Tools. Hibbing PR, Ellingson LD, Dixon PM, Welk GJ. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Apr 15; 50(4):846-854. PubMed ID: 29135657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparability of published cut-points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization. Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Tudor-Locke C, Löf M, Esteban-Cornejo I, Molina-Garcia P, Mora-Gonzalez J, Rodriguez-Ayllon M, Garcia-Marmol E, Ekelund U, Ortega FB. Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Apr 15; 29(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 30548545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of a physical activity accelerometer device worn on the hip and wrist against polysomnography. Full KM, Kerr J, Grandner MA, Malhotra A, Moran K, Godoble S, Natarajan L, Soler X. Sleep Health; 2018 Apr 15; 4(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 29555136 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity. Kerr J, Marinac CR, Ellis K, Godbole S, Hipp A, Glanz K, Mitchell J, Laden F, James P, Berrigan D. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Mar 15; 49(3):617-624. PubMed ID: 27755355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison Between Wrist-Worn and Waist-Worn Accelerometry. Loprinzi PD, Smith B. J Phys Act Health; 2017 Jul 15; 14(7):539-545. PubMed ID: 28290761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. Phillips LR, Parfitt G, Rowlands AV. J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Mar 15; 16(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22770768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of ActiGraph sampling rate on free-living physical activity measurement in youth. Clevenger KA, Brønd JC, Mackintosh KA, Pfeiffer KA, Montoye AHK, McNarry MA. Physiol Meas; 2022 Oct 10; 43(10):. PubMed ID: 36137538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]