These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

789 related items for PubMed ID: 31529008

  • 1. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Rogers RG, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Paraiso MFR, Mazloomdoost D, Grey S, Sridhar A, Wallace D, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    JAMA; 2019 Sep 17; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Komesu Y, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Paraiso MFR, Mazloomdoost D, Sridhar A, Thomas S, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug 17; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan 17; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
    BMJ; 2019 Sep 10; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R, Chill HH, Levin G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan 10; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ, Kreuwel IA, Dijkstra JR, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb 10; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMJ; 2015 Jul 23; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.
    Bowen ST, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD, Lockhart ME, Weidner AC, Ferrando CA, Nager CW, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Mazloomdoost D, Sridhar A, Gantz MG, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov 23; 225(5):506.e1-506.e28. PubMed ID: 34087229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reoperation for prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous mesh hysteropexy: characteristics of women choosing retreatment.
    Napoe GS, Luchristt D, Sridhar A, Ellington D, Ridgeway B, Mazloomdoost D, Sung V, Ninivaggio C, Harvie H, Santiago-Lastra Y, Gantz MG, Zyczynski HM.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan 23; 34(1):255-261. PubMed ID: 36449027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, Weidner A, Menefee S, Schaffer J, Pugh N, Meikle S, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    JAMA; 2018 Apr 17; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Van Eijndhoven HW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 17; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Bradley S, Gutman RE, Richter LA.
    Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb 23; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
    Giugale LE, Melnyk AI, Ruppert KM, Napoe GS, Lavelle ES, Bradley MS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep 01; 138(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34352830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair.
    Rahn DD, Richter HE, Sung VW, Pruszynski JE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug 01; 231(2):263.e1-263.e10. PubMed ID: 38710269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.