These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
379 related items for PubMed ID: 31552575
1. Comparison of different lymph node staging schemes in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis. Jin S, Wang J, Shen Y, Gan H, Xu P, Wei Y, Wei J, Wu J, Wang B, Wang J, Yang C, Zhu Y, Ye D. Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 31552575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy. Jian-Hui C, Shi-Rong C, Hui W, Si-le C, Jian-Bo X, Er-Tao Z, Chuang-Qi C, Yu-Long H. Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):11105-13. PubMed ID: 26912060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study. Amini N, Kim Y, Wilson A, Margonis GA, Ethun CG, Poultsides G, Tran T, Idrees K, Isom CA, Fields RC, Krasnick B, Weber SM, Salem A, Martin RC, Scoggins C, Shen P, Mogal HD, Schmidt C, Beal E, Hatzaras I, Shenoy R, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3016-23. PubMed ID: 27150440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic nomograms combining N classification with ratio-based nodal classifications to predict long-term survival for patients with lung adenocarcinoma after surgery: a SEER population-based study. Wang S, Yu Y, Xu W, Lv X, Zhang Y, Liu M. BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug 04; 21(1):653. PubMed ID: 34344326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma. Kılıç MÖ, Gündoğdu SB, Özden S, Saylam B, Tez M. Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb 04; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes. La Torre M, Nigri G, Petrucciani N, Cavallini M, Aurello P, Cosenza G, Balducci G, Ziparo V, Ramacciato G. Pancreatology; 2014 Feb 04; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes. Yang Y, Zheng J, Li Y. Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 May 04; 48(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 34876328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes. Conci S, Ruzzenente A, Sandri M, Bertuzzo F, Campagnaro T, Bagante F, Capelli P, D'Onofrio M, Piccino M, Dorna AE, Pedrazzani C, Iacono C, Guglielmi A. Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr 04; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation on prognostic efficacy of lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in complicated colon cancer: the first study in emergency surgery. Occhionorelli S, Andreotti D, Vallese P, Morganti L, Lacavalla D, Forini E, Pascale G. World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep 13; 16(1):186. PubMed ID: 30213260 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons of different lymph node staging systems for predicting overall survival of node-positive patients with renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Zheng W, Jiang W, Wu Q, Chen J, Zhang Z, Yu S, Guo C. BMJ Open; 2023 Apr 26; 13(4):e068044. PubMed ID: 37185648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph node status after resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: prognostic implications of different nodal staging/scoring systems. Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Gupta R, Margonis GA, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar 26; 111(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 25312786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]