These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


128 related items for PubMed ID: 31584181

  • 21. Multidetector CT of nasolacrimal canal morphology: normal variation by age, gender, and race.
    Ramey NA, Hoang JK, Richard MJ.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 24145910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Morphometric evaluation and surgical implications of the infraorbital groove, canal and foramen on cone-beam computed tomography and a review of literature.
    Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancıoğlu P, Yalçın ED.
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2019; 78(2):331-343. PubMed ID: 30178457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Computed Tomography Morphology of Affected versus Unaffected Sides in Patients with Unilateral Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Su PY, Wang JK, Chang SW.
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jan 01; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36615139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Detection and characterization of the accessory mental foramen using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Li Y, Yang X, Zhang B, Wei B, Gong Y.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2018 Mar 01; 76(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 28956507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. C-shaped canals-prevalence and root canal configuration by cone beam computed tomography evaluation in first and second mandibular molars-a cross-sectional study.
    Shemesh A, Levin A, Katzenell V, Itzhak JB, Levinson O, Avraham Z, Solomonov M.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul 01; 21(6):2039-2044. PubMed ID: 27844150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. High-resolution computed tomography assessment of bony nasolacrimal parameters: variations due to age, sex, and facial features.
    Lin Z, Kamath N, Malik A.
    Orbit; 2021 Oct 01; 40(5):364-369. PubMed ID: 32669001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Neurovascular anatomical variations in the anterior palate observed on CBCT images.
    de Oliveira-Santos C, Rubira-Bullen IR, Monteiro SA, León JE, Jacobs R.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep 01; 24(9):1044-8. PubMed ID: 22587228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Enlargement of the nasolacrimal canal in the absence of neoplasia.
    Rheeman CH, Meyer DR.
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug 01; 105(8):1498-503. PubMed ID: 9709765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.