These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 3159353

  • 1. Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection.
    Brown GL, Richardson JD, Malangoni MA, Tobin GR, Ackerman D, Polk HC.
    Ann Surg; 1985 Jun; 201(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 3159353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall.
    Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RK, van der Lei B, Schakenraad JM.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jan; 176(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 8427001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optimal prosthetic for acute replacement of the abdominal wall.
    Nagy KK, Perez F, Fildes JJ, Barrett J.
    J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3):529-32. PubMed ID: 10498309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Acellular dermal matrix compared with synthetic implant material for repair of ventral hernia in the setting of peri-operative Staphylococcus aureus implant contamination: a rabbit model.
    Milburn ML, Holton LH, Chung TL, Li EN, Bochicchio GV, Goldberg NH, Silverman RP.
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2008 Aug; 9(4):433-42. PubMed ID: 18759680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Emergency abdominal wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh: short-term benefits versus long-term complications.
    Voyles CR, Richardson JD, Bland KI, Tobin GR, Flint LM, Polk HC.
    Ann Surg; 1981 Aug; 194(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 6455099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The use of three different mesh materials in the treatment of abdominal wall defects.
    Deligiannidis N, Papavasiliou I, Sapalidis K, Kesisoglou I, Papavramidis S, Gamvros O.
    Hernia; 2002 Jul; 6(2):51-5. PubMed ID: 12152638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines.
    Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Sostrin S, Young J, Hakakha M.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Mar; 28(3):373-5. PubMed ID: 8077252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The behavior of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring process of abdominal wall defects.
    Buján J, Contreras LA, Carrera-San Martín A, Bellón JM.
    Histol Histopathol; 1997 Jul; 12(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 9225151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of adhesive properties of five different prosthetic materials used in hernioplasty.
    Kayaoglu HA, Ozkan N, Hazinedaroglu SM, Ersoy OF, Erkek AB, Koseoglu RD.
    J Invest Surg; 2005 Jul; 18(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 16036777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.