These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


138 related items for PubMed ID: 31611072

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions hearing screening in high-risk newborns.
    Salata JA, Jacobson JT, Strasnick B.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jan; 118(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9450826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
    Huang LH, Deng XQ, Yang YL, Wang SJ, Tang XQ, Guo LS, Han DM.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Transient Evoked and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in a Group of Neonates.
    Silva GC, Delecrode CR, Kemp AT, Martins F, Cardoso AC.
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 19(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 26157501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions on neonates].
    Qian J, Jiang W.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Jan; 11(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 9644170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Maternal smoking during pregnancy: impact on otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Durante AS, Ibidi SM, Lotufo JP, Carvallo RM.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21719121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates and effect of contralateral white noise stimulation.
    Franz B, Altidis P, Altidis B.
    Int Tinnitus J; 2000 Sep; 6(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 14689637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R, Freeman S, Sohmer H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001 Sep; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and estimates of cochlear tuning in preterm neonates.
    Moleti A, Sisto R, Paglialonga A, Sibella F, Anteunis L, Parazzini M, Tognola G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2984-94. PubMed ID: 19045786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
    Xu FL, Xing QJ, Cheng XY.
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Results for audiology and distortion product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Karabulut H, Dagli M, Ates A, Karaaslan Y.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Feb; 124(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 19852869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.