These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
92 related items for PubMed ID: 3162988
1. Wear rates of composites, an amalgam, and enamel under stress-bearing conditions. Pallav P, Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Apr; 59(4):426-9. PubMed ID: 3162988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. de Gee AJ, Pallav P. J Dent; 1994 Apr; 22 Suppl 1():S21-7. PubMed ID: 8201084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Dent Mater; 1996 Jul; 12(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 9002838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results]. Meier C, Lutz F. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of impact stress on the wear of some restorative materials and enamel. Aziz RA, Harrison A. Dent Mater; 1988 Oct; 4(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 3248692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel. Ratledge DK, Smith BG, Wilson RF. J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 7932268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro quantitative assessment of generalized wear of dental composites. Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():9-18. PubMed ID: 8935089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. Leinfelder KF, Suzuki S. J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Sep; 130(9):1347-53. PubMed ID: 10492543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials. Latino C, Troendle K, Summitt JB. Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives. Germec D, Cakan U, Ozdemir FI, Arun T, Cakan M. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams. Hu X, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. Pallav P, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. J Dent Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 8418108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear]. Schmidlin PR, Pasqualetti T, Imfeld T, Besek M. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003 Jan; 113(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 12768888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods. Heintze SD, Faouzi M, Rousson V, Ozcan M. Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):961-73. PubMed ID: 22698644 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator. Mehl C, Scheibner S, Ludwig K, Kern M. Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure. Ozcan M, Schoonbeek G, Gökçe B, Cömlekoglu E, Dündar M. Oper Dent; 2010 Nov; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]