These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

178 related items for PubMed ID: 31635988

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Sine wave mesopic contrast sensitivity -- defining the normal range in a young population.
    Haughom B, Strand TE.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 91(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 22176733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.
    Trueb PR, Albach C, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):890-5. PubMed ID: 19410947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. All-distance visual acuity and contrast visual acuity in eyes with a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with minimal added power.
    Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 19152978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Visual outcomes after progressive apodized diffractive intraocular lens implantation.
    García-Bella J, Ventura-Abreu N, Morales-Fernández L, Talavero-González P, Carballo-Álvarez J, Sanz-Fernández JC, Vázquez-Moliní JM, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 28(3):282-286. PubMed ID: 28967072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Contrast sensitivity comparison between AcrySof ReSTOR and Acri.LISA aspheric intraocular lenses.
    Alfonso JF, Puchades C, Fernández-Vega L, Merayo C, Montés-Micó R.
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 26(7):471-7. PubMed ID: 20635818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of cosmetically tinted soft contact lenses on higher-order wavefront aberrations and visual performance.
    Hiraoka T, Ishii Y, Okamoto F, Oshika T.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Feb; 247(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18953556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results.
    Mencucci R, Cennamo M, Venturi D, Vignapiano R, Favuzza E.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 46(3):378-387. PubMed ID: 32050218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Blue-Light Filtering Spectacle Lenses: Optical and Clinical Performances.
    Leung TW, Li RW, Kee CS.
    PLoS One; 2017 Mar; 12(1):e0169114. PubMed ID: 28045969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Visual function in patients with yellow tinted intraocular lenses compared with vision in patients with non-tinted intraocular lenses.
    Hayashi K, Hayashi H.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 90(8):1019-23. PubMed ID: 16597662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.