These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

603 related items for PubMed ID: 31653399

  • 1. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
    Yeung M, Abdulmajeed A, Carrico CK, Deeb GR, Bencharit S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
    Talmazov G, Bencharit S, Waldrop TC, Ammoun R.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
    Bencharit S, Staffen A, Yeung M, Whitley D, Laskin DM, Deeb GR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting.
    Dalal N, Ammoun R, Abdulmajeed AA, Deeb GR, Bencharit S.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB, Layton DM, Wise SL.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018 Feb; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers?
    Deeb GR, Allen RK, Hall VP, Whitley D, Laskin DM, Bencharit S.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
    Bell CK, Sahl EF, Kim YJ, Rice DD.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018 Dec; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Song X, Couso-Queiruga E, Holloway JA.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Trephination-based, guided surgical implant placement: A clinical study.
    Suriyan N, Sarinnaphakorn L, Deeb GR, Bencharit S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):411-416. PubMed ID: 30503150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides.
    D'haese R, Vrombaut T, Hommez G, De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022 Mar; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.
    Adams CR, Ammoun R, Deeb GR, Bencharit S.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 35257456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Mir-Marí J, Mühlemann S, Jung R, Hämmerle C.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019 Jan; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Deviation of dental implants placed using a novel 3D-printed surgical guide: An in vitro study.
    Etajuri EA, Suliman E, Mahmood WAA, Ibrahim N, Buzayan M, Mohd NR.
    Dent Med Probl; 2020 Jan; 57(4):359-362. PubMed ID: 33448161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery.
    Gjelvold B, Mahmood DJH, Wennerberg A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides.
    Cunha RM, Souza FÁ, Hadad H, Poli PP, Maiorana C, Carvalho PSP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
    Herschdorfer L, Negreiros WM, Gallucci GO, Hamilton A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.