These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

151 related items for PubMed ID: 31662541

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.
    Rhu J, Jun KW, Song BJ, Sung K, Cho J.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(46):e18007. PubMed ID: 31725671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Conversion from cephalic vein to external jugular vein: success rate increased on totally implantable access ports with cut-down method.
    Lin CH, Yu JC, Lee YT, Wu HS.
    Surg Innov; 2013 Dec; 20(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 23445713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.
    Obuchi K, Imaizumi K, Kasajima H, Kurushima M, Umehara M, Tsuruga Y, Yamana D, Sato K, Sato A, Suzuki S, Nakanishi K.
    In Vivo; 2022 Dec; 36(2):985-993. PubMed ID: 35241560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
    Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, Sofia M, Lombardo R, Cordio S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Percutaneous versus Cut-Down Technique for Indwelling Port Placement.
    Matiotti-Neto M, Eskander MF, Tabatabaie O, Kasumova G, Bliss LA, Ng SC, Tawa NE, Murphy B, Critchlow JF, Tseng JF.
    Am Surg; 2017 Dec 01; 83(12):1336-1342. PubMed ID: 29336750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Analysis of the Outcomes in Central Venous Access Port Implantation Performed by Residents via the Internal Jugular Vein and Subclavian Vein.
    Matsushima H, Adachi T, Iwata T, Hamada T, Moriuchi H, Yamashita M, Kitajima T, Okubo H, Eguchi S.
    J Surg Educ; 2017 Dec 01; 74(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 27932306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
    Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Pace U, Bonomo G, Monfardini L, Della Vigna P, Rotmensz N, Radice D, Zampino MG, Fazio N, de Braud F, Andreoni B, Goldhirsch A.
    Ann Oncol; 2009 May 01; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cephalic Vein Cut-Down Method for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Single-Institution Experience.
    Hataoka T, Sanmoto Y, Kinuta S.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2024 Jan 01; 98():244-250. PubMed ID: 37356657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture vs. Cut-down and Residents vs. Senior Surgeons.
    Otsubo R, Yano H, Matsumoto M, Tanaka A, Nonaka T, Hidaka S, Matsumoto K, Tsuchiya T, Sato S, Nagayasu T.
    In Vivo; 2021 Jan 01; 35(2):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 33622921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception.
    Plumhans C, Mahnken AH, Ocklenburg C, Keil S, Behrendt FF, Günther RW, Schoth F.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Sep 01; 79(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 20227211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
    Hoareau-Gruchet F, Rtail R, Sulaj H, Khirnetkina A, Reyt E, Righini CA.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr 01; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
    Araújo C, Silva JP, Antunes P, Fernandes JM, Dias C, Pereira H, Dias T, Fougo JL.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb 01; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A novel "shrug technique" for totally implantable venous access devices via the external jugular vein: A consecutive series of 254 patients.
    Kagawa T, Ueyama S, Kobayashi T, Okabayashi H, Kuroda S, Fujiwara T.
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar 01; 115(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 27813159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Totally implantable central venous access devices in patients with cancer. Experience at a private oncology center].
    Cortés-Flores AO, Morgan-Villela G, Juárez-Uzeta EA, Fuentes-Orozco C, Jiménez-Tornero J, González-Ojeda A.
    Cir Cir; 2012 Mar 01; 80(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 23351446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.