These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 31693453

  • 1. Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.
    Chang S, Egeth HE.
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 31693453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?
    Chang S, Egeth HE.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):260-269. PubMed ID: 33241528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C, Kerzel D.
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J, Burger R.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT, Bahle B, Vecera SP.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
    Nordfang M, Dyrholm M, Bundesen C.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Measuring the time course of selection during visual search.
    Palmer EM, Van Wert MJ, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 30242674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
    Painter DR, Dux PE, Travis SL, Mattingley JB.
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb 26; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T.
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun 25; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
    Won BY, Kosoyan M, Geng JJ.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan 25; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T, Busch NA, Schubö A.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb 25; 32(2):367-377. PubMed ID: 31702429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
    Talsma D, Coe B, Munoz DP, Theeuwes J.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr 25; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T, Kumada T, Kawahara J.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May 25; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.