These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

205 related items for PubMed ID: 31701304

  • 1. Similar miRNomic signatures characterize the follicular fluids collected after follicular and luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.
    Cimadomo D, Carmelo R, Parrotta EI, Scalise S, Santamaria G, Alviggi E, De Angelis MT, Sarro G, Vaiarelli A, Venturella R, Rienzi L, Zullo F, Ubaldi FM, Cuda G.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jan; 37(1):149-158. PubMed ID: 31701304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.
    Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Colamaria S, Trabucco E, Alviggi C, Venturella R, Alviggi E, Carmelo R, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug 01; 33(8):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 29912374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Luteal phase after conventional stimulation in the same ovarian cycle might improve the management of poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria: a case series.
    Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Conforti A, Schimberni M, Giuliani M, D'Alessandro P, Colamaria S, Alviggi C, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM.
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Jan 01; 113(1):121-130. PubMed ID: 31837743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders.
    Luo Y, Sun L, Dong M, Zhang X, Huang L, Zhu X, Nong Y, Liu F.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Oct 15; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 33059712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Characterization and analysis of differentially expressed microRNAs in hircine ovaries during the follicular and luteal phases.
    Ling YH, Guo XF, Chen T, Ding JP, Ma YH, Chu MX, Di R, Zhang YH, Zhang XR.
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Mar 15; 166():47-57. PubMed ID: 26778121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. DuoStim cycles potentially boost reproductive outcomes in poor prognosis patients.
    Cecchino GN, Roque M, Cerrillo M, Filho RDR, Chiamba FDS, Hatty JH, García-Velasco JA.
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2021 Jun 15; 37(6):519-522. PubMed ID: 32954881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. What is the true place of a double stimulation and double oocyte retrieval in the same cycle for patients diagnosed with poor ovarian reserve? A systematic review including a meta-analytical approach.
    Sfakianoudis K, Pantos K, Grigoriadis S, Rapani A, Maziotis E, Tsioulou P, Giannelou P, Kontogeorgi A, Pantou A, Vlahos N, Koutsilieris M, Simopoulou M.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jan 15; 37(1):181-204. PubMed ID: 31797242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Identification of miRNAs associated with the follicular-luteal transition in the ruminant ovary.
    McBride D, Carré W, Sontakke SD, Hogg CO, Law A, Donadeu FX, Clinton M.
    Reproduction; 2012 Aug 15; 144(2):221-33. PubMed ID: 22653318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cumulus cell gene expression in luteal-phase-derived oocytes after double stimulation in one menstrual cycle.
    Mishieva N, Martazanova B, Bogatyreva K, Korolkova A, Kirillova A, Veyukova M, Burmenskaya O, Abubakirov A, Sukhikh GT.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Sep 15; 41(3):518-526. PubMed ID: 32593508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Combined microRNAome and transcriptome analysis of follicular phase and luteal phase in porcine ovaries.
    Zhang X, Zhang L, Shang J, Tao Q, Tian M, Ma Y, Xu Y, Ding Y, Zhou R, Li K, Yin Z.
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Jul 15; 54(7):1018-1025. PubMed ID: 31077469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations.
    Liu X, Mai H, Chen P, Zhang Z, Wu T, Chen J, Sun P, Zhou C, Liang X, Huang R.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Mar 21; 20(1):54. PubMed ID: 35313911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Flexible ovarian stimulation in a poor responder: a case report and literature review.
    Xu B, Li Y.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Apr 21; 26(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 23497915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Qin N, Chen Q, Hong Q, Cai R, Gao H, Wang Y, Sun L, Zhang S, Guo H, Fu Y, Ai A, Tian H, Lyu Q, Daya S, Kuang Y.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug 21; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation vs. luteal-phase stimulation in suboptimal responders: a randomized controlled trial.
    Suñol J, Castillo JC, Ortiz JA, Ten J, Fuentes A, Moliner B, Martínez M, Llácer J, Guerrero J, Pitas A, Bernabeu A, Bernabeu R.
    F S Rep; 2023 Dec 21; 4(4):344-352. PubMed ID: 38204945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.