These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
392 related items for PubMed ID: 31706410
21. [Difference between the cognitive and control ability and the responsibility in forensic psychiatry evaluation]. Li XW, Gao BL, Hu F, Wu C, Zhang H, Guan YJ, Lai W, Li Y, Wang Y, Wu DL, Cao XL. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 29(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 24350541 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [The use of operational criteria for evaluations of mental competency]. Kocha H. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2013 Aug; 115(10):1057-63. PubMed ID: 24341072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Forensic mental health clinical evaluation: an analysis of interstate and intersystemic differences. Warren JI, Rosenfeld B, Fitch WL, Hawk G. Law Hum Behav; 1997 Aug; 21(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 9335195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law]. Gkotsi GM, Moulin V, Gasser J. Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [The application of criminal responsibility rating scale for suspects with mental retardation]. Dong RX, Cai WX, Tang T, Huang FY, Liu C. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 26(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 20653136 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Identification of grades division to diminished criminal responsibility in mental disorder offender]. Cai WX, Shao Y, Guan W. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 20(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15495806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations. Vitacco MJ, Gottfried ED, Batastini AB. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Mental disorder and legal responsibility: the relevance of stages of decision making. Kalis A, Meynen G. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014 Jul; 37(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24694295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Giorgi-Guarnieri D, Janofsky J, Keram E, Lawsky S, Merideth P, Mossman D, Schwart-Watts D, Scott C, Thompson J, Zonana H, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002 Feb; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants. Mossman D. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007 Feb; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS). Parmigiani G, Mandarelli G, Meynen G, Carabellese F, Ferracuti S. Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov 07; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Closing forensic psychiatric hospitals in Italy: a new deal for mental health care?]. Casacchia M, Malavolta M, Bianchini V, Giusti L, Di Michele V, Giosuè P, Ruggeri M, Biondi M, Roncone R, Directors Italian Section, World Association For Psychosocial Rehabilitation (WAPR). Riv Psichiatr; 2015 Nov 07; 50(5):199-209. PubMed ID: 26489069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]