These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1299 related items for PubMed ID: 31740272

  • 1. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T, Huot L, Elbaz M, Delmas C, Aissaoui N, Farhat F, Mewton N, Bonnefoy E, IMPELLA-STIC investigators.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B, Ibrahim K, Loehn T, Werner N, Sinning JM, Pappalardo F, Pieri M, Skurk C, Lauten A, Landmesser U, Westenfeld R, Horn P, Pauschinger M, Eckner D, Twerenbold R, Nordbeck P, Salinger T, Abel P, Empen K, Busch MC, Felix SB, Sieweke JT, Møller JE, Pareek N, Hill J, MacCarthy P, Bergmann MW, Henriques JPS, Möbius-Winkler S, Schulze PC, Ouarrak T, Zeymer U, Schneider S, Blankenberg S, Thiele H, Schäfer A, Westermann D.
    Circulation; 2019 Mar 05; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.
    Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, Fröhlich G, Bott-Flügel L, Byrne R, Dirschinger J, Kastrati A, Schömig A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov 04; 52(19):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19007597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Javaid AI, Michalek JE, Gruslova AB, Hoskins SA, Ahsan CH, Feldman MD.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan 04; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A, Khan MS, Saad M, Siddiqui S, Eltahawy E.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan 04; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Jin C, Yandrapalli S, Yang Y, Liu B, Aronow WS, Naidu SS.
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb 04; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.
    Wernly B, Seelmaier C, Leistner D, Stähli BE, Pretsch I, Lichtenauer M, Jung C, Hoppe UC, Landmesser U, Thiele H, Lauten A.
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Nov 04; 108(11):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 30900010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, Hurley NC, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP, Berkowitz A, Masoudi FA, Messenger JC, Parzynski CS, Ngufor C, Girotra S, Amin AP, Shah ND, Desai NR.
    JAMA; 2020 Feb 25; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Percutaneous left ventricular assist support is associated with less pulmonary congestion and lower rate of pneumonia in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Haberkorn S, Uwarow A, Haurand J, Jung C, Kelm M, Westenfeld R, Horn P.
    Open Heart; 2020 Nov 25; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 33132209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and haemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon versus Impella pump: Real-life single-centre preliminary results.
    Januszek R, Pawlik A, Rzeszutko Ł, Bartuś K, Bartuś S.
    Kardiol Pol; 2022 Nov 25; 80(12):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 36047958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB, Schreiber T, Dixon S, Alaswad K, Patel K, Almany S, Khandelwal A, Hanson I, George A, Ashbrook M, Blank N, Abdelsalam M, Sareen N, Timmis SBH, O'Neill Md WW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb 15; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 65.