These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


458 related items for PubMed ID: 31771896

  • 1. Prostatic Artery Embolization Using 100-300-μm Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres to Treat Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributable to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Single-Center Outcomes Analysis with Medium-Term Follow-up.
    Ayyagari R, Powell T, Staib L, Chapiro J, Raja A, Bhatia S, Chai T, Schoenberger S, Devito R.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 31771896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Prospective Randomized Trial of 100-300 μm versus 300-500 μm versus 100- to 300-μm + 300- to 500-μm Embospheres.
    Torres D, Costa NV, Pisco J, Pinheiro LC, Oliveira AG, Bilhim T.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 May; 30(5):638-644. PubMed ID: 31029381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Prostatic Artery Embolization with 50-μm Plus 100-μm Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Particles versus 100-μm PVA Particles Alone: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Wang MQ, Zhang JL, Xin HN, Yuan K, Yan J, Wang Y, Zhang GD, Fu JX.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 30297313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative study of medium- and large-volume prostates.
    Wang M, Guo L, Duan F, Yuan K, Zhang G, Li K, Yan J, Wang Y, Kang H.
    BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):155-64. PubMed ID: 25851432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prostatic Artery Embolization in Nonindex Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients: Single-center Outcomes for Urinary Retention and Gross Prostatic Hematuria.
    Ayyagari R, Powell T, Staib L, Chapiro J, Perez-Lozada JC, Bhatia S, Chai T, Schoenberger S, Devito R.
    Urology; 2020 Feb; 136():212-217. PubMed ID: 31734349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion Does Not Influence the Efficacy of Prostatic Artery Embolization.
    Meira M, de Assis AM, Moreira AM, Antunes AA, Carnevale FC, Srougi M.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):106-112. PubMed ID: 33127248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Thickness-to-Height Ratio of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion Predicts the Clinical Outcome and Morbidity of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
    Yu SCH, Cho CCM, Hung EHY, Zou J, Yuen BTY, Shi L, Chiu PKF, Yee SCH, Ng ACF.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1807-1816. PubMed ID: 31587946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Randomized Comparison of Prostatic Artery Embolization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
    Insausti I, Sáez de Ocáriz A, Galbete A, Capdevila F, Solchaga S, Giral P, Bilhim T, Isaacson A, Urtasun F, Napal S.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):882-890. PubMed ID: 32249193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia.
    Somwaru AS, Metting S, Flisnik LM, Nellamattathil MG, Sharma A, Katabathina VS.
    BMC Urol; 2020 Oct 08; 20(1):153. PubMed ID: 33032577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From a Prospective FDA-Approved Investigational Device Exemption Study.
    Salem R, Hairston J, Hohlastos E, Riaz A, Kallini J, Gabr A, Ali R, Jenkins K, Karp J, Desai K, Thornburg B, Casalino D, Miller F, Hofer M, Hamoui N, Mouli S.
    Urology; 2018 Oct 08; 120():205-210. PubMed ID: 30036614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Voiding and Storage Domain-Specific Symptom Score Outcomes After Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Urinary Retention.
    Powell T, Staib L, Liu B, Bhatia S, Chai T, Ayyagari R.
    Urology; 2021 Oct 08; 156():216-224. PubMed ID: 33961894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Quality of life and clinical symptom improvement support prostatic artery embolization for patients with acute urinary retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.
    Carnevale FC, da Motta-Leal-Filho JM, Antunes AA, Baroni RH, Marcelino AS, Cerri LM, Yoshinaga EM, Cerri GG, Srougi M.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr 08; 24(4):535-42. PubMed ID: 23434084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-Term Outcome of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Single-Centre Retrospective Study in 1072 Patients Over a 10-Year Period.
    Bilhim T, Costa NV, Torres D, Pinheiro LC, Spaepen E.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2022 Sep 08; 45(9):1324-1336. PubMed ID: 35778579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of Median Lobe Enlargement on Early Prostatic Artery Embolization Outcomes.
    Maron SZ, Sher A, Kim J, Lookstein RA, Rastinehad AR, Fischman A.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Mar 08; 31(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 31956004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Medium- and Long-Term Outcome of Prostate Artery Embolization for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results in 630 Patients.
    Pisco JM, Bilhim T, Pinheiro LC, Fernandes L, Pereira J, Costa NV, Duarte M, Oliveira AG.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Aug 08; 27(8):1115-22. PubMed ID: 27321890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Unilateral versus bilateral prostatic arterial embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate enlargement.
    Bilhim T, Pisco J, Rio Tinto H, Fernandes L, Campos Pinheiro L, Duarte M, Pereira JA, Oliveira AG, O'Neill J.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Apr 08; 36(2):403-11. PubMed ID: 23232858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prostate Artery Embolization in Patients with Prostate Volumes of 80 mL or More: A Single-Institution Retrospective Experience of 93 Patients.
    Bhatia S, Sinha VK, Harward S, Gomez C, Kava BR, Parekh DJ.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Oct 08; 29(10):1392-1398. PubMed ID: 30217744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Case-Control Comparison of Conventional End-Hole versus Balloon-Occlusion Microcatheter Prostatic Artery Embolization for Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
    Ayyagari R, Powell T, Staib L, Chapiro J, Schoenberger S, Devito R, Pollak J.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Sep 08; 30(9):1459-1470. PubMed ID: 31375451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prostatic Arterial Embolization with Small Sized Particles for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Preliminary Results.
    Li Q, Duan F, Wang MQ, Zhang GD, Yuan K.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Aug 05; 128(15):2072-7. PubMed ID: 26228221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Randomized Clinical Trial of Balloon Occlusion versus Conventional Microcatheter Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
    Bilhim T, Costa NV, Torres D, Pisco J, Carmo S, Oliveira AG.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Nov 05; 30(11):1798-1806. PubMed ID: 31587950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.