These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Feature-Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain Predicts Death in a Multicenter Population of Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Incremental to Ejection Fraction and Late Gadolinium Enhancement. Romano S, Judd RM, Kim RJ, Kim HW, Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, Jue J, White BE, Indorkar R, Shenoy C, Farzaneh-Far A. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Oct; 11(10):1419-1429. PubMed ID: 29361479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking. Dobrovie M, Barreiro-Pérez M, Curione D, Symons R, Claus P, Voigt JU, Bogaert J. Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6846-6857. PubMed ID: 31297633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain. Bucius P, Erley J, Tanacli R, Zieschang V, Giusca S, Korosoglou G, Steen H, Stehning C, Pieske B, Pieske-Kraigher E, Schuster A, Lapinskas T, Kelle S. ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking. Aurich M, Keller M, Greiner S, Steen H, Aus dem Siepen F, Riffel J, Katus HA, Buss SJ, Mereles D. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference ranges for three-dimensional feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: comparison with two-dimensional methodology and relevance of age and gender. Liu B, Dardeer AM, Moody WE, Hayer MK, Baig S, Price AM, Leyva F, Edwards NC, Steeds RP. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 34(5):761-775. PubMed ID: 29181827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting. Morais P, Marchi A, Bogaert JA, Dresselaers T, Heyde B, D'hooge J, Bogaert J. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Feb 17; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 28209163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic measurement of longitudinal strain: accuracy and its relationship with image quality. Karagodin I, Genovese D, Kruse E, Patel AR, Rashedi N, Lang RM, Mor-Avi V. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar 17; 36(3):431-439. PubMed ID: 31720940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability and Reproducibility of Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurement: A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force. Mirea O, Pagourelias ED, Duchenne J, Bogaert J, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU, EACVI-ASE-Industry Standardization Task Force. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan 17; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28528147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade: Implications for intervendor consistency and longitudinal imaging studies. Castel AL, Menet A, Ennezat PV, Delelis F, Le Goffic C, Binda C, Guerbaai RA, Levy F, Graux P, Tribouilloy C, Maréchaux S. Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Jan 17; 109(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26514326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of myocardial strain in patients with isolated left ventricular non-compaction and healthy subjects using deformable registration algorithm: comparison with feature tracking. Liu J, Li Y, Cui Y, Cao Y, Yao S, Zhou X, Wetzl J, Zeng W, Shi H. BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Sep 03; 20(1):400. PubMed ID: 32883201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of global longitudinal strain using standardized myocardial deformation imaging: a modality independent software approach. Riffel JH, Keller MG, Aurich M, Sander Y, Andre F, Giusca S, Aus dem Siepen F, Seitz S, Galuschky C, Korosoglou G, Mereles D, Katus HA, Buss SJ. Clin Res Cardiol; 2015 Jul 03; 104(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 25643953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain. Cao JJ, Ngai N, Duncanson L, Cheng J, Gliganic K, Chen Q. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr 19; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of left atrial strain and strain rate using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance myocardial feature tracking: a feasibility study. Kowallick JT, Kutty S, Edelmann F, Chiribiri A, Villa A, Steinmetz M, Sohns JM, Staab W, Bettencourt N, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Hasenfuß G, Lotz J, Schuster A. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Aug 12; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 25196447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of myocardial deformation by deformable registration-based analysis of cine MRI: validation with tagged CMR. Lamacie MM, Houbois CP, Greiser A, Jolly MP, Thavendiranathan P, Wintersperger BJ. Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul 12; 29(7):3658-3668. PubMed ID: 30770973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Erley J, Zieschang V, Lapinskas T, Demir A, Wiesemann S, Haass M, Osman NF, Simonetti OP, Liu Y, Patel AR, Mor-Avi V, Unal O, Johnson KM, Pieske B, Hansmann J, Schulz-Menger J, Kelle S. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May 12; 36(5):899-911. PubMed ID: 32056087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking. Gertz RJ, Lange T, Kowallick JT, Backhaus SJ, Steinmetz M, Staab W, Kutty S, Hasenfuß G, Lotz J, Schuster A. PLoS One; 2018 May 12; 13(3):e0193746. PubMed ID: 29538467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]