These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
478 related items for PubMed ID: 31779459
1. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA. Pluháček F, Unzeitigová A, Marešová K, Rybář J. Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes]. Streho M, Dariel R, Giraud JM, Verret C, Fenolland JR, Crochelet O, May F, Maurin JF, Renard JP. J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W. J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Shin J, Lee JW, Kim EA, Caprioli J. Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes? Dey A, David RL, Asokan R, George R. Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK. Bao F, Huang W, Zhu R, Lu N, Wang Y, Li H, Wu S, Lin H, Wang J, Zheng X, Huang J, Li Y, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between different tonometers following intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation. Elfwwal MM, Elbasty MK, Khattab MF, ElShazly MI. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 34472983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. Chen M, Zhang L, Xu J, Chen X, Gu Y, Ren Y, Wang K. BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov 14; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Matsuura M, Murata H, Fujino Y, Yanagisawa M, Nakao Y, Tokumo K, Nakakura S, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R. Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr 14; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun 14; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters. Bao F, Huang Z, Huang J, Wang J, Deng M, Li L, Yu A, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun 14; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]