These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

268 related items for PubMed ID: 31797849

  • 1. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
    Garg S, Kumar S, Jain S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug 01; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr 01; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
    Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb 01; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique.
    Sayed ME, Sayed ME, Al-Makramani BM, Al-Sanabani FA, Mohamed MS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Sep 01; 17(9):734-739. PubMed ID: 27733716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Sep 01; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.
    Nissan J, Gross M, Shifman A, Assif D.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr 01; 29(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 11966969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A, Dixit S, Hoshing C, Raikar SP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov 01; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug 01; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH, Purk JH, Tira DE, Eick JD.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May 01; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.