These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
417 related items for PubMed ID: 31800152
1. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain. Bucius P, Erley J, Tanacli R, Zieschang V, Giusca S, Korosoglou G, Steen H, Stehning C, Pieske B, Pieske-Kraigher E, Schuster A, Lapinskas T, Kelle S. ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility study on myocardial strain assessment using fast-SENC cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Giusca S, Korosoglou G, Zieschang V, Stoiber L, Schnackenburg B, Stehning C, Gebker R, Pieske B, Schuster A, Backhaus S, Pieske-Kraigher E, Patel A, Kawaji K, Steen H, Lapinskas T, Kelle S. Sci Rep; 2018 Sep 20; 8(1):14100. PubMed ID: 30237411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting? Pierpaolo P, Rolf S, Manuel BP, Davide C, Dresselaers T, Claus P, Bogaert J. Radiol Med; 2020 May 20; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement. Erley J, Genovese D, Tapaskar N, Alvi N, Rashedi N, Besser SA, Kawaji K, Goyal N, Kelle S, Lang RM, Mor-Avi V, Patel AR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Aug 08; 21(1):46. PubMed ID: 31391036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Head-to-head comparison of cardiovascular MR feature tracking cine versus acquisition-based deformation strain imaging using myocardial tagging and strain encoding. Backhaus SJ, Metschies G, Zieschang V, Erley J, Mahsa Zamani S, Kowallick JT, Lapinskas T, Pieske B, Lotz J, Kutty S, Hasenfuß G, Kelle S, Schuster A. Magn Reson Med; 2021 Jan 08; 85(1):357-368. PubMed ID: 32851707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction. El-Saadi W, Engvall JE, Alfredsson J, Karlsson JE, Martins M, Sederholm S, Faisal Zaman S, Ebbers T, Kihlberg J. Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022 Jan 08; 9():949440. PubMed ID: 35966533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking. Aurich M, Keller M, Greiner S, Steen H, Aus dem Siepen F, Riffel J, Katus HA, Buss SJ, Mereles D. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec 08; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Strain-Encoding and Feature-Tracking Derived Myocardial Deformation Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in a Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Cohort. Chew JD, George-Durrett K, Acheampong B, Weiner JG, Slaughter JC, Parra DA, Soslow JH. Pediatr Cardiol; 2022 Aug 08; 43(6):1338-1348. PubMed ID: 35238958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms. Barreiro-Pérez M, Curione D, Symons R, Claus P, Voigt JU, Bogaert J. Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec 08; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Layer-Specific Strain Is Preload Dependent: Comparison between Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking. Grund FF, Kristensen CB, Myhr KA, Vejlstrup N, Hassager C, Mogelvang R. J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 Apr 08; 34(4):377-387. PubMed ID: 33421611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking for characterization of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: correlation of global longitudinal strain with invasive diastolic functional indices. Ito H, Ishida M, Makino W, Goto Y, Ichikawa Y, Kitagawa K, Omori T, Dohi K, Ito M, Sakuma H. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jun 04; 22(1):42. PubMed ID: 32498688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Erley J, Zieschang V, Lapinskas T, Demir A, Wiesemann S, Haass M, Osman NF, Simonetti OP, Liu Y, Patel AR, Mor-Avi V, Unal O, Johnson KM, Pieske B, Hansmann J, Schulz-Menger J, Kelle S. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May 04; 36(5):899-911. PubMed ID: 32056087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of global myocardial function by cine MRI deformable registration-based analysis: Comparison with MR feature tracking and speckle-tracking echocardiography. Lamacie MM, Thavendiranathan P, Hanneman K, Greiser A, Jolly MP, Ward R, Wintersperger BJ. Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr 04; 27(4):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 27491873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative analysis of endocardial and epicardial left ventricular myocardial deformation-comparison of strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Altiok E, Neizel M, Tiemann S, Krass V, Kuhr K, Becker M, Zwicker C, Koos R, Lehmacher W, Kelm M, Marx N, Hoffmann R. J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Nov 04; 25(11):1179-88. PubMed ID: 22951120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reference ranges for three-dimensional feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: comparison with two-dimensional methodology and relevance of age and gender. Liu B, Dardeer AM, Moody WE, Hayer MK, Baig S, Price AM, Leyva F, Edwards NC, Steeds RP. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May 04; 34(5):761-775. PubMed ID: 29181827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]