These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Development and application of a bioluminescence-based test for assimilable organic carbon in reclaimed waters. Weinrich LA, Giraldo E, Lechevallier MW. Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 75(23):7385-90. PubMed ID: 19820156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of disinfectant residual on the interaction between bacterial growth and assimilable organic carbon in a drinking water distribution system. Li W, Zhang J, Wang F, Qian L, Zhou Y, Qi W, Chen J. Chemosphere; 2018 Jul; 202():586-597. PubMed ID: 29597176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of using a particle counter or flow-cytometer for bacterial enumeration in the assimilable organic carbon (AOC) analysis method. Aggarwal S, Jeon Y, Hozalski RM. Biodegradation; 2015 Sep; 26(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 26139595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A rapid technique for assessing assimilable organic carbon of UV/H2O2-treated water. Bazri MM, Mohseni M. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2013 Sep; 48(9):1086-93. PubMed ID: 23573929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of assimilable organic carbon (AOC) and bacterial regrowth in drinking water distribution system. Liu W, Wu H, Wang Z, Ong SL, Hu JY, Ng WJ. Water Res; 2002 Feb; 36(4):891-8. PubMed ID: 11848359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A new method to assess the influence of migration from polymeric materials on the biostability of drinking water. Bucheli-Witschel M, Kötzsch S, Darr S, Widler R, Egli T. Water Res; 2012 Sep 01; 46(13):4246-60. PubMed ID: 22682266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assimilable organic carbon (AOC) determination using GFP-tagged Pseudomonas fluorescens P-17 in water by flow cytometry. Tang P, Wu J, Liu H, Liu Y, Zhou X. PLoS One; 2018 Sep 01; 13(6):e0199193. PubMed ID: 29902279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the microbial growth potential of slow sand filtrate with the biomass production potential test in comparison with the assimilable organic carbon method. van der Kooij D, Veenendaal HR, van der Mark EJ, Dignum M. Water Res; 2017 Nov 15; 125():270-279. PubMed ID: 28865376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing removal of trace organic compounds and assimilable organic carbon (AOC) at advanced and traditional water treatment plants. Lou JC, Lin CY, Han JY, Tseng WB, Hsu KL, Chang TW. Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Jun 15; 184(6):3491-501. PubMed ID: 21713462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Slowly biodegradable organic compounds impact the biostability of non-chlorinated drinking water produced from surface water. Hijnen WAM, Schurer R, Bahlman JA, Ketelaars HAM, Italiaander R, van der Wal A, van der Wielen PWJJ. Water Res; 2018 Feb 01; 129():240-251. PubMed ID: 29153877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assimilable organic carbon cycling within drinking water distribution systems. Pick FC, Fish KE, Boxall JB. Water Res; 2021 Jun 15; 198():117147. PubMed ID: 33962239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of microbial regrowth potential by assimilable organic carbon in various reclaimed water and distribution systems. Thayanukul P, Kurisu F, Kasuga I, Furumai H. Water Res; 2013 Jan 01; 47(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 23134741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of assimilable organic carbon and free chlorine on bacterial growth in drinking water. Liu X, Wang J, Liu T, Kong W, He X, Jin Y, Zhang B. PLoS One; 2015 Jan 01; 10(6):e0128825. PubMed ID: 26034988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]