These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
592 related items for PubMed ID: 31829288
1. High negative predictive value of 68Ga PSMA PET-CT for local lymph node metastases in high risk primary prostate cancer with histopathological correlation. Rahman LA, Rutagengwa D, Lin P, Lin M, Yap J, Lai K, Mancuso P, Rathore P, Haghighi K, Gassner P, Wong LH, Lalak N. Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec 11; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31829288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary lymph-node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in high-risk prostate cancer: pathologic correlation with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. Corona-Montes VE, González-Cuenca E, Fernández-Noyola G, Olarte-Casas MA, Bobadilla-Salazar D, Medrano-Urtecho HM, Asimakopoulos AD. Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug 11; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit. Maestroni UV, Campobasso D, Guarino G, Acampora A, Scarlattei M, Ziglioli F, Dinale F, Baldari G, Migliari S, Gasparro D, Ferretti S, Silini EM, Ruffini L. Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun 11; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, Behr SC, Zhang L, Barbato F, Ceci F, Farolfi A, Schwarzenböck SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Nguyen HG, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Reiter RE, Holden S, Herrmann K, Zhu S, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Calais J. JAMA Oncol; 2021 Nov 01; 7(11):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 34529005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan for pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer. Franklin A, Yaxley WJ, Raveenthiran S, Coughlin G, Gianduzzo T, Kua B, McEwan L, Wong D, Delahunt B, Egevad L, Samaratunga H, Brown N, Parkinson R, Roberts MJ, Yaxley JW. BJU Int; 2021 Jan 01; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How accurate is 68Gallium-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography / computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) on primary lymph node staging before radical prostatectomy in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer? A study of patient- and lymph node- based analyses. Erdem S, Simsek DH, Degirmenci E, Aydin R, Bagbudar S, Ozluk Y, Sanli Y, Sanli O, Ozcan F. Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan 01; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Distribution of prostate cancer recurrences on gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (68 Ga-PSMA) positron-emission/computed tomography after radical prostatectomy with pathological node-positive extended lymph node dissection. Huits TH, Luiting HB, van der Poel HG, Nandurkar R, Donswijk M, Schaake E, Vogel W, Roobol MJ, Wit E, Stricker P, Emmett L, van Leeuwen PJ. BJU Int; 2020 Jun 01; 125(6):876-883. PubMed ID: 32181951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature. Luiting HB, van Leeuwen PJ, Busstra MB, Brabander T, van der Poel HG, Donswijk ML, Vis AN, Emmett L, Stricker PD, Roobol MJ. BJU Int; 2020 Feb 01; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ga68-PSMA PET for lymph node staging in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Spena G, Moretti TB, Dávila FS, Dos Anjos G, Khan I, Calace FP, Aveta A, Pandolfo SD, Tufano A, Izzo A, Farias A, Perdonà S, Maes K. Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2024 Aug 01; 76(4):467-473. PubMed ID: 39051893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in primary staging of patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: A single-center cohort analysis. Rajwa P, Heidenreich J, Drzezga A, Schmidt M, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A. Prostate; 2024 Jan 01; 84(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 37750292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT based primary staging and histological correlation after extended pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy. Kopp J, Kopp D, Bernhardt E, Manka L, Beck A, Gerullis H, Karakiewicz P, Schoerner W, Hammerer P, Schiffmann J. World J Urol; 2020 Dec 01; 38(12):3085-3090. PubMed ID: 32103332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Provides Accurate Staging of Lymph Node Regions Prior to Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Herlemann A, Wenter V, Kretschmer A, Thierfelder KM, Bartenstein P, Faber C, Gildehaus FJ, Stief CG, Gratzke C, Fendler WP. Eur Urol; 2016 Oct 01; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer. van Leeuwen PJ, Emmett L, Ho B, Delprado W, Ting F, Nguyen Q, Stricker PD. BJU Int; 2017 Feb 01; 119(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 27207581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. von Eyben FE, Picchio M, von Eyben R, Rhee H, Bauman G. Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep 01; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer. Barbosa ÁRG, Amaral BS, Lourenço DB, Bianco B, Gushiken FA, Apezzato M, Silva JF, Cunha MLD, Filippi RZ, Baroni RH, Lemos GC, Carneiro A. Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2022 Sep 01; 20():eAO6599. PubMed ID: 35584444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 68Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging Before Radical Prostatectomy: Central Review of Imaging and Comparison with Histopathology of Extended Lymphadenectomy. Esen T, Falay O, Tarim K, Armutlu A, Koseoglu E, Kilic M, Seymen H, Sarikaya AF, Kiremit MC, Balbay MD, Canda AE, Baydar DE, Kordan Y, Demirkol MO, Tilki D. Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar 01; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard. Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, de Angelis M, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Cucchiara V, Gandaglia G, Raggi D, Necchi A, Karakiewicz P, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb 01; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using 18F-PSMA PET/CT. Pianou NK, Stavrou PZ, Vlontzou E, Rondogianni P, Exarhos DN, Datseris IE. Hell J Nucl Med; 2019 Feb 01; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PSMA PET Scan Era: A Changing Paradigm PSMA PET and Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer Management. Haxhimolla J, Kua B, Gilbourd D, Haxhimolla H. Semin Oncol Nurs; 2020 Aug 01; 36(4):151044. PubMed ID: 32723519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial. Jansen BHE, Bodar YJL, Zwezerijnen GJC, Meijer D, van der Voorn JP, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Wondergem M, Roeleveld TA, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, van Moorselaar RJA, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Feb 01; 48(2):509-520. PubMed ID: 32789599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]