These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 318695

  • 21. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ.
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF, Larsen RB.
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Retentive properties of stainless steel pins cemented with ethyl cyanoacrylate.
    Lambert RL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Aug; 34(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 1057017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations: what is the evidence?
    Vaught RL.
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 17923714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Microscopic study of smooth silver-plated retention pins in amalgam.
    Galindo Y, McLachlan K, Kasloff Z.
    J Dent Res; 1980 Feb; 59(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 6985920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Coronal reinforcement with cross-splinted pin-amalgam restorations.
    Lambert RL, Robinson FB, Lindemuth JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 3864972
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Reinforced matrices for pin-amalgam restorations reduce microleakage.
    Harrington WG, Moon PC, Crockett WD, Shepard FE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jun; 41(6):622-4. PubMed ID: 374719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Silver pins: their influence on the strength and adaptation of amalgam.
    Moffa JP, Going RE, Gettleman L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Nov; 28(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 4507571
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive.
    Belcher MA, Stewart GP.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Mar; 128(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 9066215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Post and core restoration of endodontically treated teeth.
    Abou-Rass M.
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():99-107. PubMed ID: 1520948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.