These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

294 related items for PubMed ID: 31892684

  • 1. Microleakage Evaluation of an Alkasite Restorative Material: An In Vitro Dye Penetration Study.
    Kini A, Shetty S, Bhat R, Shetty P.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Nov 01; 20(11):1315-1318. PubMed ID: 31892684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study.
    Meshram P, Meshram V, Palve D, Patil S, Gade V, Raut A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019 Nov 01; 30(3):403-407. PubMed ID: 31397416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Punathil S, Almalki SA, AlJameel AH, Gowdar IM, Mc VA, Chinnari K.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul 01; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative Assessment of Marginal Micro Leakage of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Used on Primary Teeth: An In-vitro Study.
    Al Ghwainem A, Alqarni AS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan 01; 25(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 38514432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.
    Sujith R, Yadav TG, Pitalia D, Babaji P, Apoorva K, Sharma A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun 01; 21(6):691-695. PubMed ID: 33025941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Microleakage Comparative Evaluation of RMGIC and Alkasite with and without Adhesive System in Class V Cavity: An In Vitro Study.
    Dennis D, Pintauli S, Debora S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jul 01; 22(7):735-738. PubMed ID: 34615776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing marginal microleakage in Class V cavities restored with flowable composite and Cention-N using confocal microscope-an in-vitro study.
    Shenoi PR, Kokane VB, Thawale HV, Kubde RR, Gunwal MK, Shahu SP.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021 Jul 01; 32(3):348-353. PubMed ID: 35229775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An in vitro study.
    Mazumdar P, Das A, Das UK.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019 Jul 01; 30(2):277-281. PubMed ID: 31169163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG, Venumbaka NR, Mungara J, Vijayakumar P, Rajendran S, Elangovan A.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014 Jul 01; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K, Boutsiouki C, Gerasimou P.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep 01; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE, Farrag NM.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010 Sep 01; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May 01; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An In vitro study.
    Bansal D, Mahajan M.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017 May 01; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion.
    Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Rocha RA, Palma-Dibb RG.
    Braz Dent J; 2005 May 01; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun 01; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.