These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

97 related items for PubMed ID: 319082

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Courcol RJ, Husson MO, Izard DE, Martin GR.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P, Carbone M, Fera MT, Teti G.
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983 Sep; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of a multitest microtechnique for yeast identification.
    Miller RE, Lu LP.
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Jul; 42(7):238-42. PubMed ID: 945942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Identification of Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, and Alcaligenes with the API 20 NE system.
    Peladan F, Monteil H.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Feb; 36(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 3279389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE, Gardner BB, Clark SJ, Matsen JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
    Sala A, Dore R, Raffaele L, Cappello P.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of bacterial isolates associated with failed loggerhead sea turtle eggs.
    Awong-Taylor J, Craven KS, Griffiths L, Bass C, Muscarella M.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 May; 104(5):1244-51. PubMed ID: 18028359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test].
    Stanek G, Hirschl A, Rotter M.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.