These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

62 related items for PubMed ID: 3191319

  • 1. Film processing for mammography.
    Law J, Kirkpatrick AE.
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Oct; 61(730):939-42. PubMed ID: 3191319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
    Brink C, de Villiers JF, Lötter MG, van Zyl M.
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ, Boyd MM, al Yousef K.
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
    Persliden J, Fransson V, Vitak B, Fagerberg G.
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme.
    Law J.
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
    Sprawls P, Kitts EL.
    Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Technical note: physical evaluation of recent Kodak films for mammography.
    Fernández JM, Guibelalde E.
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Sep 07; 66(789):828-32. PubMed ID: 8220957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.