These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 31914022

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement.
    Belloti JC, Tamaoki MJ, Franciozi CE, Santos JB, Balbachevsky D, Chap Chap E, Albertoni WM, Faloppa F.
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 May 01; 126(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 18711658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures.
    Kural C, Sungur I, Kaya I, Ugras A, Ertürk A, Cetinus E.
    Orthopedics; 2010 Nov 02; 33(11):801. PubMed ID: 21053882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
    Illarramendi A, González Della Valle A, Segal E, De Carli P, Maignon G, Gallucci G.
    Int Orthop; 1998 Nov 02; 22(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9651777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Distal radius fractures: Classifications concordance among orthopedic residents on a teaching hospital.
    Peña-Martínez VM, Villanueva-Guerra E, Tamez-Mata Y, Simental-Mendía M, Gallardo-Madrid A, Blázquez-Saldaña J, Acosta-Olivo C.
    J Orthop Sci; 2024 Jan 02; 29(1):133-137. PubMed ID: 36460558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G, Leinardi L, Congia S, Frigau L, Mola F, Capone A.
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar 12; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Fernandez classification for distal radius fractures.
    Naqvi SG, Reynolds T, Kitsis C.
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Aug 12; 34(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 19321533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
    Wæver D, Madsen ML, Rölfing JHD, Borris LC, Henriksen M, Nagel LL, Thorninger R.
    Injury; 2018 Jun 12; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Does the CT improve inter- and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures?
    Arealis G, Galanopoulos I, Nikolaou VS, Lacon A, Ashwood N, Kitsis C.
    Injury; 2014 Oct 12; 45(10):1579-84. PubMed ID: 25042062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
    Jin WJ, Jiang LS, Shen L, Lu H, Cui YM, Zhou Q, Dai LY.
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Oct 12; 32(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17950210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.