These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

136 related items for PubMed ID: 31922375

  • 1. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children.
    Abdel-Ghaffar HS, Abdelal FA, Osman MA, Soliman OM.
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.
    Jain D, Ghai B, Bala I, Gandhi K, Banerjee G.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 26383088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.
    Gupta S, Dogra N, Chauhan K.
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017 Dec; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children.
    Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim HJ, Shin HY, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 19(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19143960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C, Brimacombe J.
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of I-Gel™ size 2 airway in different degrees of neck flexion in anesthetized children - a prospective, self-controlled trial.
    Jain D, Ghai B, Gandhi K, Banerjee G, Bala I, Samujh R.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27779349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.
    Biedler A, Wrobel M, Schneider S, Soltész S, Ziegeler S, Grundmann U.
    J Anesth; 2013 Oct; 27(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 23460409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison between Air-Q Self Pressurized Airway Device with Blocker and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult female patients undergoing elective gynecological operations.
    Ismail Youssef MM, Dobal NM, Hammad YM, El-Refai NAR, Abdelrahman RAA.
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2024 Oct; 56(2):108-120. PubMed ID: 39166502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
    Buckham M, Brooker M, Brimacombe J, Keller C.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of head and neck position on performance of the Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask: a randomized crossover study.
    Yoo S, Park SK, Kim WH, Hur M, Bahk JH, Lim YJ, Kim JT.
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Feb; 85(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 29589419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Chaki T, Tachibana S, Kumita S, Sato H, Hamada K, Tokinaga Y, Yamakage M.
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar 01; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lightwand-Guided Insertion of Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway: Comparison with Standard Digital Manipulation Insertion.
    Kim DH, Chae YJ, Min SK, Ha EJ, Yoo JY.
    Med Sci Monit; 2021 Jan 11; 27():e928538. PubMed ID: 33428608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C, Brimacombe L, Brimacombe M.
    Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov 11; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparing leak pressure of LMA® ProSeal™ versus i-gel® at head rotation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chaki T, Koizumi M, Tachibana S, Matsumoto T, Kumagai T, Hashimoto Y, Yamakage M.
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jan 11; 71(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 38017196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients.
    Goldmann K, Jakob C.
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Jun 11; 100(6):1605-1610. PubMed ID: 15920181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.