These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 31930500

  • 1. Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of tokens and primary reinforcers.
    Bonfonte SA, Bourret JC, Lloveras LA.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 31930500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Using progressive ratio schedules to evaluate tokens as generalized conditioned reinforcers.
    Russell D, Ingvarsson ET, Haggar JL, Jessel J.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 29193060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An assessment of token value and effectiveness: A replication.
    Hangen MM, Romero AN, Norris HM, Gorycki KA, Roberts BR, Neidert PL.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Nov; 56(4):898-913. PubMed ID: 37485744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Substitution effects in a generalized token economy with pigeons.
    Andrade LF, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):123-135. PubMed ID: 28000221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Generalized conditioned reinforcement with pigeons in a token economy.
    DeFulio A, Yankelevitz R, Bullock C, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):26-46. PubMed ID: 24979723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y, Borrero JC, DeLeon IG.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An analysis of the value of token reinforcement using a multiple-schedule assessment.
    Fiske KE, Isenhower RW, Bamond MJ, Lauderdale-Littin S.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jan; 53(1):563-571. PubMed ID: 31329284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Incentivizing physical activity using token reinforcement with preschool children.
    Patel RR, Normand MP, Kohn CS.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):499-515. PubMed ID: 30637721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The several roles of stimuli in token reinforcement.
    Bullock CE, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 25604188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Assessing the value of token reinforcement for individuals with autism.
    Fiske KE, Isenhower RW, Bamond MJ, Delmolino L, Sloman KN, LaRue RH.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Mar; 48(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 25930718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rats' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):198-212. PubMed ID: 25130299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT, GOLLUB LR.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant.
    Widholm JJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Imam AA, Warren-Boulton FR.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Nov; 76(3):245-63. PubMed ID: 11768710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.
    DeLeon IG, Chase JA, Frank-Crawford MA, Carreau-Webster AB, Triggs MM, Bullock CE, Jennett HK.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014 Nov; 47(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 24782203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Pigeons' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Mazur JE, Biondi DR.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 23460072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Risky choice in pigeons: preference for amount variability using a token-reinforcement system.
    Lagorio CH, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Sep; 98(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 23008519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons.
    Pietras CJ, Hackenberg TD.
    Behav Processes; 2005 Jun 30; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences.
    Andrade LF, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jul 30; 98(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 22851791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Second-order schedules of token reinforcement with pigeons: effects of fixed- and variable-ratio exchange schedules.
    Foster TA, Hackenberg TD, Vaidya M.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Sep 30; 76(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 11599637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.