These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


263 related items for PubMed ID: 31958308

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence.
    Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Liebing C, Beer A, Flacke F, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Apr; 20(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 29664706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Performance and System Validation of a New Cellular-Enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using a New Standard Reference Measurement Procedure of Isotope Dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry.
    Angelides K, Matsunami RK, Engler DA.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 May 22; 9(5):1061-70. PubMed ID: 26002836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
    Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, Schmid V, Grenningloh M, Forst T, Pfützner A.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr 22; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Investigation of the Accuracy of 18 Marketed Blood Glucose Monitors.
    Klonoff DC, Parkes JL, Kovatchev BP, Kerr D, Bevier WC, Brazg RL, Christiansen M, Bailey TS, Nichols JH, Kohn MA.
    Diabetes Care; 2018 Aug 22; 41(8):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 29898901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Petruschke T.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct 07; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Accuracy of the CONTOUR® blood glucose monitoring system.
    Harrison B, Leazenby C, Halldorsdottir S.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul 01; 5(4):1009-13. PubMed ID: 21880245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Liebing C, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar 01; 12(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 29291625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G, Pleus S, Link M, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Högel J, Haug C.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep 01; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Real-world practice level data analysis confirms link between variability within Blood Glucose Monitoring Strip (BGMS) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in Type 1 Diabetes.
    Heald AH, Livingston M, Fryer A, Cortes G, Anderson SG, Gadsby R, Laing I, Lunt M, Young RJ, Stedman M.
    Int J Clin Pract; 2018 Dec 01; 72(12):e13252. PubMed ID: 30168887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Performance analysis of the OneTouch UltraVue blood glucose monitoring system.
    Chang A, Orth A, Le B, Menchavez P, Miller L.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Sep 01; 3(5):1158-65. PubMed ID: 20144431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A New, Wireless-enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device: Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation.
    Christiansen M, Greene C, Pardo S, Warchal-Windham ME, Harrison B, Morin R, Bailey TS.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May 01; 11(3):567-573. PubMed ID: 28745099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The Accu-Chek Mobile blood glucose monitoring system used under controlled conditions meets ISO 15197 standards in the hands of diabetes patients.
    Sachse D, Bolstad N, Jonsson M, Sæves I, Johansson CB, Delezuch W, Hagve M, Hardang IM, Isaksson HS, Ivarsson A, Lehto L, Keikkala E, Mattsson N, Ranta JK, Stavelin A, Sudmann AA, Varsi K.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2012 Sep 01; 72(5):374-9. PubMed ID: 22900743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. System accuracy evaluation of systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose: a comparison of a patient-use system with six professional-use systems.
    Freckmann G, Schmid C, Pleus S, Baumstark A, Link M, Stolberg E, Haug C, Sieber J.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Jul 01; 52(7):1079-86. PubMed ID: 24681433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of a New, Wireless-enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device.
    Bailey TS, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Warchal-Windham ME, Harrison B, Morin R, Christiansen M.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jul 01; 11(4):736-743. PubMed ID: 28617617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.
    Pfützner A, Mitri M, Musholt PB, Sachsenheimer D, Borchert M, Yap A, Forst T.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr 01; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.
    Freckmann G, Link M, Schmid C, Pleus S, Baumstark A, Haug C.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep 01; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.