These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 31958308

  • 41. Performance of the DIDGET blood glucose monitoring system in children, teens, and young adults.
    Deeb LC, Parkes JL, Pardo S, Schachner HC, Viggiani MT, Wallace J, Bailey T.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep 01; 5(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 22027310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system.
    Ji LN, Guo LX, Liu LB.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jan 01; 54(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 26053011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range.
    Zijlstra E, Heinemann L, Fischer A, Kapitza C.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov 01; 10(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 27605592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Comparative Evaluations of Randomly Selected Four Point-of-Care Glucometer Devices in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Wolde M, Tarekegn G, Kebede T.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 May 01; 12(3):673-679. PubMed ID: 29338325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.
    Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Parkin CG.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan 01; 7(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 23439170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Fundamental Importance of Reference Glucose Analyzer Accuracy for Evaluating the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMSs).
    Bailey TS, Klaff LJ, Wallace JF, Greene C, Pardo S, Harrison B, Simmons DA.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul 01; 10(4):872-5. PubMed ID: 26902794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M, Kropff J, Matuleviciene V, Joseph JI, Attvall S, Theodorsson E, Hirsch IB, Imberg H, Dahlqvist S, Klonoff D, Haraldsson B, DeVries JH, Lind M.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul 01; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Use of Blood Glucose Meters Featuring Color Range Indicators Improves Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes in Comparison to Blood Glucose Meters Without Color (ACCENTS Study).
    Grady M, Katz LB, Levy BL.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Nov 01; 12(6):1211-1219. PubMed ID: 29848106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Evaluation of System Accuracy, Precision, Hematocrit Influence, and User Performance of Two Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Based on ISO 15197:2013/EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Pleus S, Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Mende J, Wehrstedt S, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    Diabetes Ther; 2024 Feb 01; 15(2):447-459. PubMed ID: 38100029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Analytical Performance Evaluation of Infopia Element™ Auto-coding Blood Glucose Monitoring System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Park HI, Lee SS, Son JW, Kwon HS, Kim SR, Chae H, Kim M, Kim Y, Yoo S.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Nov 01; 30(6):849-858. PubMed ID: 27074748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.
    Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Feb 01; 16(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 24205978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Proof of Concept Study to Assess the Influence of Oxygen Partial Pressure in Capillary Blood on SMBG Measurements.
    Baumstark A, Pleus S, Jendrike N, Liebing C, Hinzmann R, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Nov 01; 13(6):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 30841739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Performance evaluation and labeling comprehension of a new blood glucose monitoring system with integrated information management.
    List SM, Starks N, Baum J, Greene C, Pardo S, Parkes JL, Schachner HC, Cuddihy R.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep 01; 5(5):1144-53. PubMed ID: 22027308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. A Multicenter Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in 21 Leading Hospitals in Spain.
    Bedini JL, Wallace JF, Petruschke T, Pardo S.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug 07; 10(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 26253142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Effects of simulated altitude on blood glucose meter performance: implications for in-flight blood glucose monitoring.
    Olateju T, Begley J, Flanagan D, Kerr D.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul 01; 6(4):867-74. PubMed ID: 22920813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.
    Halldorsdottir S, Warchal-Windham ME, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Parkes JL, Simmons DA.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep 01; 7(5):1294-304. PubMed ID: 24124957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep 01; 6(5):1060-75. PubMed ID: 23063032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.