These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
429 related items for PubMed ID: 3199191
21. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4. Tanabe S, Doi T, Umeda K, Fujita I. J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2683-99. PubMed ID: 16000525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth. Samonds JM, Choi V, Priebe NJ. J Neurosci; 2019 Oct 09; 39(41):8024-8037. PubMed ID: 31462533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation. Neri P, Parker AJ, Blakemore C. Nature; 1999 Oct 14; 401(6754):695-8. PubMed ID: 10537107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A simple model accounts for the response of disparity-tuned V1 neurons to anticorrelated images. Read JC, Parker AJ, Cumming BG. Vis Neurosci; 2002 Oct 14; 19(6):735-53. PubMed ID: 12688669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Receptive field asymmetries and sensitivity to random dot stereograms. Gonzalez F, Alonso JM, Relova JL, Perez R. Arch Ital Biol; 1996 Mar 14; 134(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 8741224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception. Masson GS, Busettini C, Miles FA. Nature; 1997 Sep 18; 389(6648):283-6. PubMed ID: 9305842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence of Stereoscopic Surface Disambiguation in the Responses of V1 Neurons. Samonds JM, Tyler CW, Lee TS. Cereb Cortex; 2017 Mar 01; 27(3):2260-2275. PubMed ID: 26965904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative characterization of disparity tuning in ventral pathway area V4. Hinkle DA, Connor CE. J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct 01; 94(4):2726-37. PubMed ID: 15987762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. Nature; 1991 Jul 11; 352(6331):156-9. PubMed ID: 2067576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Human primary visual cortex shows larger population receptive fields for binocular disparity-defined stimuli. Alvarez I, Hurley SA, Parker AJ, Bridge H. Brain Struct Funct; 2021 Dec 11; 226(9):2819-2838. PubMed ID: 34347164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Brain activation difference evoked by different binocular disparities of stereograms: An fMRI study. Wang F, Yang W, Zhang L, Gundran A, Zhu X, Liu J, Li X, Bao S, Gao S. Phys Med; 2016 Oct 11; 32(10):1308-1313. PubMed ID: 27453205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Rejection of false matches for binocular correspondence in macaque visual cortical area V4. Tanabe S, Umeda K, Fujita I. J Neurosci; 2004 Sep 15; 24(37):8170-80. PubMed ID: 15371518 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Spatial disparity sensitivity in area PMLS of the Siamese cat. Bacon BA, Mimeault D, Lepore F, Guillemot JP. Brain Res; 2001 Jul 06; 906(1-2):149-56. PubMed ID: 11430872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1. Prince SJ, Cumming BG, Parker AJ. J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan 06; 87(1):209-21. PubMed ID: 11784743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]