These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 32008343

  • 1. Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model.
    Jiang Y, Li C, Liu Y, Shi K, Zhang W, Liu M, Chen M.
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 32008343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
    Li C, Chen M, Wan B, Yu J, Liu M, Zhang W, Wang J.
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Non-small cell lung cancer: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for assessment of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion.
    Tsuchiya N, Doai M, Usuda K, Uramoto H, Tonami H.
    PLoS One; 2017 Nov; 12(2):e0172433. PubMed ID: 28207858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Discriminating Between Benign Tissue, Low and High Gleason Grade Prostate Cancer.
    Di Trani MG, Nezzo M, Caporale AS, De Feo R, Miano R, Mauriello A, Bove P, Manenti G, Capuani S.
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1328-1337. PubMed ID: 30545680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Chen T, Li Y, Lu SS, Zhang YD, Wang XN, Luo CY, Shi HB.
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Histogram analysis of stretched-exponential and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging models for distinguishing low and intermediate/high gleason scores in prostate carcinoma.
    Liu W, Liu XH, Tang W, Gao HB, Zhou BN, Zhou LP.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):491-498. PubMed ID: 29412492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters and mono-exponential ADC for determination of clinically significant cancer in patients with prostate cancer.
    Park H, Kim SH, Lee Y, Son JH.
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4235-4243. PubMed ID: 32965517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
    Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, Vargas HA, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Hricak H, Akin O.
    Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 24475824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnostic Performance of Monoexponential DWI Versus Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Si Y, Liu RB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):358-368. PubMed ID: 29812977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.