These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 32037769

  • 1. [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].
    Shi H, Ge HS, Chen LY, Li ZH.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb 01; 38(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 32037769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of orthopaedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: Maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage or a rapid maxillary expander.
    Wu Z, Zhang X, Li Z, Liu Y, Jin H, Chen Q, Guo J.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb 01; 23(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 31452316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dentofacial and skeletal effects of two orthodontic maxillary protraction protocols: bone anchors versus facemask.
    Tabellion M, Lisson JA.
    Head Face Med; 2024 Oct 18; 20(1):60. PubMed ID: 39425193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients: A single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Seiryu M, Ida H, Mayama A, Sasaki S, Sasaki S, Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T.
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan 18; 90(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31398066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial.
    de Souza RA, Rino Neto J, de Paiva JB.
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Sep 02; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 31475309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects produced by the facemask with and without skeletal anchorage for the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Rutili V, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Pierleoni F, Giuntini V, Franchi L.
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Mar 31; 45(2):157-168. PubMed ID: 36074492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Cornelis MA, Tepedino M, Riis NV, Niu X, Cattaneo PM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jan 29; 43(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 32815989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, Martin C, Weaver B, Gunel E.
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Jan 29; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhou S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct 29; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the skeletodental effects of miniscrew-anchored and tooth-anchored facemask treatment in growing patients with skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Choi YK, Park JJ, Jeon HH, Kim YI.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov 29; 26(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 37272219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.
    Lee HJ, Choi DS, Jang I, Cha BK.
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May 01; 92(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 34964848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Soft and hard tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage implant in treatment of Class III malocclusion].
    Meng Y, Liu J, Guo X, Deng K, Liu M, Zhou J.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun 01; 30(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 22768767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the change in inferior sclera exposure after maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Kale B, Buyukcavus MH, Esenlik E.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jul 01; 21(7):854-858. PubMed ID: 29984715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical effects of maxillary protraction in different stages of dentition in skeletal class III children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang J, Wang Y, Yang Y, Zhang L, Hong Z, Ji W, Zhang L.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Nov 01; 25(4):549-561. PubMed ID: 35303382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Treatment effects of maxillary protraction with palatal plates vs conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.
    Lee YS, Park JH, Kim J, Lee NK, Kim Y, Kook YA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Oct 01; 162(4):520-528. PubMed ID: 35933257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Lee SH, Koh SD, Chung DH, Lee JW, Lee SM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr 01; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effectiveness of alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction combined with maxillary protraction in the treatment of patients with a class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Almuzian M, McConnell E, Darendeliler MA, Alharbi F, Mohammed H.
    J Orthod; 2018 Dec 01; 45(4):250-259. PubMed ID: 30252620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up.
    Anne Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, Nute S, Doherty B, Stivaros N, McDowall R, Shargill I, Ahmad A, Walsh T, Worthington H.
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep 01; 39(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 22984102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.