These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

608 related items for PubMed ID: 32058351

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Left Lateralization of the Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential Reflects Aided Processing and Speech-in-Noise Performance of Older Listeners With a Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C, Kuk F, Korhonen P.
    Ear Hear; ; 44(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 36331191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F, Seper E, Lau CC, Korhonen P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B, Debener S, Schmidt J, Jaeger M, Neher T.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference.
    Walden BE, Surr RK, Grant KW, Van Summers W, Cord MT, Dyrlund O.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):662-76. PubMed ID: 16515138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
    Kuk F, Keenan D.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.
    Jenkins KA, Fodor C, Presacco A, Anderson S.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jan; 39(4):810-824. PubMed ID: 29287038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F, Jackson A, Keenan D, Lau CC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Using the Repeat-Recall Test to Examine Factors Affecting Context Use.
    Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):771-780. PubMed ID: 33588513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB, Wouters J, Moonen M.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A, Iglehart F.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
    Chung K.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Apr; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J, Duke M, Miller S, Schafer E, Jones C, Rakita L, Dunn A, Browning S, Neumann S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW, Camarota K, Harris FP, Dean J.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
    Mackenzie E, Lutman ME.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, Seeto M, Van Dun B.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.