These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

217 related items for PubMed ID: 32068169

  • 1. An Independent Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility Evaluation of Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and Kostuik Classification Systems for Spinal Tumor.
    Xu C, Yin M, Sun Z, Yan Y, Mo W, Yan W.
    World Neurosurg; 2020 May; 137():e564-e569. PubMed ID: 32068169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spine Instability Neoplastic Score: agreement across different medical and surgical specialties.
    Arana E, Kovacs FM, Royuela A, Asenjo B, Pérez-Ramírez Ú, Zamora J, Spanish Back Pain Research Network Task Force for the Improvement of Inter-Disciplinary Management of Spinal Metastasis.
    Spine J; 2016 May; 16(5):591-9. PubMed ID: 26471708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reliability of the spinal instability neoplastic scale among radiologists: an assessment of instability secondary to spinal metastases.
    Fisher CG, Versteeg AL, Schouten R, Boriani S, Varga PP, Rhines LD, Heran MK, Kawahara N, Fourney D, Reynolds JJ, Fehlings MG, Gokaslan ZL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 25247954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An independent evaluation on the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of Toyama classification system for cervical dumbbell tumors.
    Yin M, Huang Q, Sun Z, Gao X, Chen G, He S, Xia Y, Ma J, Mo W, Xiao J.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar; 96(10):e6183. PubMed ID: 28272207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intra- and interobserver reliability of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score system for instability in spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pennington Z, Ahmed AK, Cottrill E, Westbroek EM, Goodwin ML, Sciubba DM.
    Ann Transl Med; 2019 May; 7(10):218. PubMed ID: 31297383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score in Evaluating Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumor: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation.
    Chen J, Wu C, Hong H, Wang X, Zhang J, Xue P, Jiang J, Wang D, Cui Z.
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1630-1637. PubMed ID: 35715948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Lauder AJ, Inda DJ, Bott AM, Clare MP, Fitzgibbons TC, Mormino MA.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Interobserver agreement for the spine instability neoplastic score varies according to the experience of the evaluator.
    Teixeira WG, Coutinho PR, Marchese LD, Narazaki DK, Cristante AF, Teixeira MJ, Barros Filho TE, Camargo OP.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2013 Apr; 68(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 23525318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons.
    Cheng J, Liu P, Sun D, Qin T, Ma Z, Liu J.
    Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(5):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 27807778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
    Yinjie Y, Gen W, Hongbo W, Chongqing X, Fan Z, Yanqi F, Xuequn W, Wen M.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
    Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Konigsberg DE, Ouellet JA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun 01; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.