These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Can PEEK Be an Implant Material? Evaluation of Surface Topography and Wettability of Filled Versus Unfilled PEEK With Different Surface Roughness. Elawadly T, Radi IAW, El Khadem A, Osman RB. J Oral Implantol; 2017 Dec; 43(6):456-461. PubMed ID: 29064768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of Nano, Micro, and Macro Topography of Dental Implant Surfaces on Human Gingival Fibroblasts. Petrini M, Pierfelice TV, D'Amico E, Di Pietro N, Pandolfi A, D'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Mandatori D, Schiavone V, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep 13; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 34576038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The Effects of Laser with Different Parameters and Crosshatching on Fibroblast Adhesion and Proliferation to Implant Surfaces. Çelebi H, Arpacı PU, Çelik I, Akman S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017 Sep 13; 32(6):1231–1240. PubMed ID: 28518180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Early Response of Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells to Pink-Shaded Anodized Dental Implant Abutments: An In Vitro Study. Mussano F, Genova T, Laurenti M, Zicola E, Munaron L, Rivolo P, Mandracci P, Carossa S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018 Sep 13; 33(3):571-579. PubMed ID: 29763495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Nano-topographical surface engineering for enhancing bioactivity of PEEK implants (in vitro-histomorphometric study). Mostafa D, Kassem YM, Omar SS, Shalaby Y. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov 13; 27(11):6789-6799. PubMed ID: 37847259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Surface modification affects human gingival epithelial cell behavior on polyetheretherketone surfaces. Omatsu K, Yamawaki I, Taguchi Y, Tsumori N, Hashimoto Y, Umeda M. Dent Mater J; 2024 Mar 29; 43(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 38246630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of cell morphology and adhesion capacity of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium discs with different roughened surfaces: an in vitro scanning electron microscope analysis and cell culture study. Yildiz H, Sen E, Dalcik H, Meseli SE. Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2023 Mar 29; 82(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 36000589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Keul C. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov 29; 112(5):1278-88. PubMed ID: 24969411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging. Atsü SS, Aksan ME, Bulut AC. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Nov 29; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of titanium surface characteristics on the behavior and function of oral fibroblasts. Att W, Yamada M, Ogawa T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Nov 29; 24(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 19587863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. In vitro degradation of a biodegradable polylactic acid/magnesium composite as potential bone augmentation material in the presence of titanium and PEEK dental implants. Zimmermann T, Ferrandez-Montero A, Lieblich M, Ferrari B, González-Carrasco JL, Müller WD, Schwitalla AD. Dent Mater; 2018 Oct 29; 34(10):1492-1500. PubMed ID: 29941350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. 3D engineered human gingiva fabricated with electrospun collagen scaffolds provides a platform for in vitro analysis of gingival seal to abutment materials. Sakulpaptong W, Clairmonte IA, Blackstone BN, Leblebicioglu B, Powell HM. PLoS One; 2022 Oct 29; 17(2):e0263083. PubMed ID: 35113915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]