These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

255 related items for PubMed ID: 32092668

  • 1. Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse.
    Şükür YE, Dökmeci F, Çetinkaya ŞE, Seval MM.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():127-131. PubMed ID: 32092668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Izett-Kay ML, Rahmanou P, Cartwright RJ, Price N, Jackson SR.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Advanced uterovaginal prolapse: is vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty as effective as in lesser degrees of prolapse?
    Alas A, Chandrasekaran N, Devakumar H, Martin L, Hurtado E, Davila GW.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 28779416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R, Chill HH, Levin G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, Geoffrion R, Sokol AI, Karram M, Cundiff GW, Blomquist JL, Barber MD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Campagna G, Vacca L, Panico G, Rumolo V, Caramazza D, Lombisani A, Rossitto C, Gadonneix P, Scambia G, Ercoli A.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 34132865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Extraperitoneal high vaginal cuff suspension at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse: Results of a modified McCall technique from a longitudinal clinical study.
    Zilberlicht A, Dwyer PL, Karmakar D, Carswell F, Schierlitz L.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 61(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33346932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Long-Term Experience with Modified McCall Culdoplasty in Women Undergoing Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Bushra M, Anglim B, Al-Janabi A, Lovatsis D, Alarab M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Oct; 43(10):1129-1135. PubMed ID: 33984523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Housmans S, van Kuijk S, Deprest J, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven H.
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse.
    Colombo M, Milani R.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9704759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L, Lu YX, Shen WJ, Liu X, Liu JX, Zhang YH, Ge J, Zhao Y, Niu K, Wang WY.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun 25; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Vaginal-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Vault Suspension for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: 12-month Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.
    Cengiz H, Yildiz S, Alay I, Kaya C, Eren E, Iliman DE.
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2021 Jun 25; 10(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 33747770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher.
    Stoter LM, Notten KJB, Claas M, Tijsseling D, Ruefli M, van den Tillaart F, van Kuijk SMJ, Milani AL, Kluivers KB.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 May 25; 35(5):985-993. PubMed ID: 38416155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Pandeva I, Mistry M, Fayyad A.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar 25; 36(3):787-793. PubMed ID: 27224927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.