These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, Coomarasamy A. Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Mar 01; 25(2):202-223. PubMed ID: 30624659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Siristatidis CS, Sertedaki E, Vaidakis D. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May 23; 5(5):CD011872. PubMed ID: 28534597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Endometrial receptivity in women of advanced age: an underrated factor in infertility. Pathare ADS, Loid M, Saare M, Gidlöf SB, Zamani Esteki M, Acharya G, Peters M, Salumets A. Hum Reprod Update; 2023 Nov 02; 29(6):773-793. PubMed ID: 37468438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Metabolomics as a tool to identify biomarkers to predict and improve outcomes in reproductive medicine: a systematic review. Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Abdalla H, Nikolau D, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, Holmes E, Thum MY. Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Nov 01; 23(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 29069503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction. Okun N, Sierra S, GENETICS COMMITTEE, SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS. J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan 01; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An update on the progress of transcriptomic profiles of human endometrial receptivity. Wang X, Yu Q. Biol Reprod; 2018 Apr 01; 98(4):440-448. PubMed ID: 29365037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]