These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

105 related items for PubMed ID: 3210875

  • 21. Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance.
    Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, Vanpoucke FJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21063206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [The promontory test and electrocochleography in deafness caused by mumps].
    Laszig R, Lehnhardt E, Battmer RD.
    HNO; 1986 Apr; 34(4):143-5. PubMed ID: 3710840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL, Hanekom JJ.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT, Saunders E, Knight MR, Cowan RS.
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):160-75. PubMed ID: 16403611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Loudness scaling from preoperative testing to fitting cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants.
    Schoen F, Mueller J.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000 Feb; 57():290-7. PubMed ID: 11892172
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear.
    van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Laneau J, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):73-86. PubMed ID: 15668040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Psychophysical data and speech comprehension after 2 years with the Clark/Nucleus prosthesis].
    Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Laszig R, Mohme-Hesse K.
    HNO; 1988 May; 36(5):188-92. PubMed ID: 3170272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T, Brokx J, Wouters J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 May; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D, Bestel J, Fraysse B.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.
    Chua TE, Bachman M, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Dec; 32(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 21610498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C, Riss D, Kaider A, Mair A, Wagenblast J, Baumgartner WD, Gstöttner W, Hamzavi JS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Influence of non-optimal levels of electrical stimulation in cochlear implantees on hearing benefits.
    Wasowski A, Lorens A, Obrycka A, Walkowiak A, Wozniak A, Skarzynski H, Palko T.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():485-8. PubMed ID: 21756679
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming.
    Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Ruth RA, Lambert PR, Dolan-Ash S, Schloffman JJ.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):255-61. PubMed ID: 9334774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.
    Litvak LM, Delgutte B, Eddington DK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2079-98. PubMed ID: 14587607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.
    Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, van der Veen EH, Kalkman RK, Frijns JH.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 14(5):781-90. PubMed ID: 23695303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users.
    Hoppe U, Rosanowski F, Iro H, Eysholdt U.
    Scand Audiol; 2001 Oct; 30(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 11409789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.