These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

578 related items for PubMed ID: 32111393

  • 21. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems.
    Soares MM, Harari ND, Cardoso ES, Manso MC, Conz MB, Vidigal GM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Mir-Marí J, Mühlemann S, Jung R, Hämmerle C.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Accuracy of fully guided orthodontic mini-implant placement evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography: a study involving human cadaver heads.
    Kniha K, Brandt M, Bock A, Modabber A, Prescher A, Hölzle F, Danesh G, Möhlhenrich SC.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1299-1306. PubMed ID: 32613434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Analysis of Linear and Angular Deviations of Implants Installed With a Tomographic-Guided Surgery Technique: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    de Oliveira GJPL, de Souza Mattos W, Albaricci M, Marcantonio É, Queiroz TP, Margonar R.
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Aug; 45(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 31206348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Accuracy of a guided implant system with milled surgical templates.
    Li-Rodríguez JK, Díaz-Durany M, Romeo-Rubio M, Paz Salido M, Pradíes G.
    J Oral Sci; 2022 Apr 01; 64(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 35321962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Impact of Surgical Template on the Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Xu LW, You J, Zhang JX, Liu YF, Peng W.
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec 01; 25(8):641-646. PubMed ID: 26619380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Accuracy of computer-assisted, template-guided implant placement compared with conventional implant placement by hand-An in vitro study.
    Schneider D, Sax C, Sancho-Puchades M, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep 01; 32(9):1052-1060. PubMed ID: 34143522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
    Yeung M, Abdulmajeed A, Carrico CK, Deeb GR, Bencharit S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun 01; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Accuracy of implant placement using CAD-CAM tooth-supported surgical guides for an auricular prosthesis in vitro.
    Fan Y, Wei H, Zhao R, Lin X, Bai S.
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan 01; 33(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 36710294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug 01; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan 01; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.