These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
191 related items for PubMed ID: 32133486
1. Comparison of post-treatment changes with and without retention in adolescents treated for maxillary impacted canines-a randomized controlled trial. Naraghi S, Ganzer N, Bondemark L, Sonesson M. Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr 03; 43(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 32133486 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth after 2 years of retention in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial comparing two bonded and a vacuum-formed retainer. Naraghi S, Ganzer N, Bondemark L, Sonesson M. Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr 03; 43(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 33351886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth during retention and 1 year after removal of retention-an RCT on adolescents retained with two different bonded retainers and a vacuum-formed retainer. Naraghi S, Ganzer N, Bondemark L, Sonesson M. Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov 30; 45(6):629-636. PubMed ID: 37119264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial. Sonesson M, Naraghi S, Bondemark L. Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar 30; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Vacuum-formed retainer versus bonded retainer for dental stabilization in the mandible-a randomized controlled trial. Part I: retentive capacity 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment. Krämer A, Sjöström M, Hallman M, Feldmann I. Eur J Orthod; 2020 Nov 03; 42(5):551-558. PubMed ID: 31665279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-treatment stability after 5 years of retention with vacuum-formed and bonded retainers-a randomized controlled trial. Krämer A, Sjöström M, Apelthun C, Hallman M, Feldmann I. Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb 10; 45(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 35968668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods--a randomized controlled trial. Edman Tynelius G, Petrén S, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug 10; 37(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 25452629 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial. Steegmans PAJ, Cavagnetto D, Reynders RAM. Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec 10; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. No differences seen in outcomes between three different methods of orthodontic retention. Walker M. Evid Based Dent; 2013 Sep 10; 14(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 24071676 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. O'Rourke N, Albeedh H, Sharma P, Johal A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep 10; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment. Krämer A, Sjöström M, Hallman M, Feldmann I. Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr 03; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul 27; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention--a randomized controlled trial. Edman Tynelius G, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct 27; 32(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 20080961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ORTHODONTIC RETENTION. Studies of retention capacity, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability. Tynelius GE. Swed Dent J Suppl; 2014 Oct 27; (236):9-65. PubMed ID: 26685634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can vacuum-formed retainers maintain arch dimensions and alignment compared to Hawley and fixed bonded retainers after treatment with fixed appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hussain U, Kunwar SS, Khan UW, Alnazeh AA, Kamran MA, Alam S, Aziz A, Zaheen M, Pandis N, Campobasso A. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct 01; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39177154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized controlled trial of three orthodontic retention methods in Class I four premolar extraction cases -- stability after 2 years in retention. Edman Tynelius G, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May 01; 16(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 23324112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the unwanted tooth movement associated with an extended maxillary fixed retainer (3D analysis). Abbas MH, Abdalla EM, Marzouk ES, Harouni NME. BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug 06; 24(1):899. PubMed ID: 39107745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Orthodontic retention--three methods trialed. Cope JF, Lamont T. Evid Based Dent; 2016 Mar 06; 17(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 27012577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Muessig D. Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug 01; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of efficacy of thermoplastic retainer with round and rectangular bonded lingual wire retainer in the mandible two years after orthodontic treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Kanizaj Ugrin S, Špalj S. Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar 01; 28(3):183. PubMed ID: 38424224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]