These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
458 related items for PubMed ID: 32175821
1. Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators. Suver CM, Hamann JK, Chin EM, Goldstein FC, Blazel HM, Manzanares CM, Doerr MJ, Asthana SJ, Mangravite LM, Levey AI, Lah JJ, Edwards DF. AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 32175821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Researchers experience and views on participants' comprehension of informed consent in clinical trials in Malawi: a descriptive qualitative study. Kazembe DM, Woldeamanuel Y, Abay SM. BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Sep 27; 25(1):101. PubMed ID: 39334067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation. Killawi A, Khidir A, Elnashar M, Abdelrahim H, Hammoud M, Elliott H, Thurston M, Asad H, Al-Khal AL, Fetters MD. BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Feb 04; 15():9. PubMed ID: 24495499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "I passed the test!" Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa. Masiye F, Mayosi B, de Vries J. BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb 15; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 28202021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Phase 3 Oncology Clinical Trials in South Africa: Experimentation or Therapeutic Misconception? Malan T, Moodley K. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb 15; 11(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 27106890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: a qualitative pilot study. Khalil SS, Silverman HJ, Raafat M, El-Kamary S, El-Setouhy M. BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Aug 29; 8():9. PubMed ID: 17727728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The psychology of "cure" - unique challenges to consent processes in HIV cure research in South Africa. Moodley K, Staunton C, Rossouw T, de Roubaix M, Duby Z, Skinner D. BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan 24; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 30678664 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent. Nakkash R, Qutteina Y, Nasrallah C, Wright K, El-Alti L, Makhoul J, Al-Ali K. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec 24; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research with Alzheimer's disease subjects: informed consent and proxy decision making. High DM. J Am Geriatr Soc; 1992 Sep 24; 40(9):950-7. PubMed ID: 1512393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali. Traore K, Bull S, Niare A, Konate S, Thera MA, Kwiatkowski D, Parker M, Doumbo OK. BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jun 16; 16():42. PubMed ID: 26077875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gatekeeping in cancer clinical trials in Canada: The ethics of recruiting the "ideal" patient. Bell JAH, Kelly MT, Gelmon K, Chi K, Ho A, Rodney P, Balneaves LG. Cancer Med; 2020 Jun 16; 9(12):4107-4113. PubMed ID: 32314549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia. McWhirter RE, Eckstein L. J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun 16; 15(2):243-257. PubMed ID: 29532387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam. Van Nuil JI, Nguyen TTT, Le Nguyen TN, Nguyen VVC, Chambers M, Ta TDN, Merson L, Nguyen TPD, Hoang MTV, Parker M, Bull S, Kestelyn E. BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan 10; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 31924199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis. D'Abramo F, Schildmann J, Vollmann J. BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep 09; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study. Kraft SA, Porter KM, Duenas DM, Guerra C, Joseph G, Lee SS, Shipman KJ, Allen J, Eubanks D, Kauffman TL, Lindberg NM, Anderson K, Zepp JM, Gilmore MJ, Mittendorf KF, Shuster E, Muessig KR, Arnold B, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021 Sep 09; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 32981477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Four reasons why too many informed consents to clinical research are invalid: a critical analysis of current practices. Wisgalla A, Hasford J. BMJ Open; 2022 Mar 04; 12(3):e050543. PubMed ID: 35246415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada. Townsend A, Cox SM. BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Oct 12; 14():40. PubMed ID: 24119203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study. Doerr M, Maguire Truong A, Bot BM, Wilbanks J, Suver C, Mangravite LM. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Feb 16; 5(2):e14. PubMed ID: 28209557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]