These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

255 related items for PubMed ID: 32182191

  • 1. Simultaneous removal of NOx, SO2, and Hg from flue gas in FGD absorber with oxidant injection (NaClO2)- full-scale investigation.
    Jędrusik M, Łuszkiewicz D, Świerczok A, Gostomczyk MA, Kobylańska-Pawlisz M.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Jun; 70(6):629-640. PubMed ID: 32182191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quick vaporization of sprayed sodium hypochlorite (NaClO(aq)) for simultaneous removal of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and mercury (Hg0).
    Byoun S, Shin DN, Moon IS, Byun Y.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jul; 69(7):857-866. PubMed ID: 30513260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Study on the removal of NO(x) from simulated flue gas using acidic NaClO2 solution.
    Deshwal BR, Lee SH, Jung JH, Shon BH, Lee HK.
    J Environ Sci (China); 2008 Jul; 20(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18572519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Experiments on and mechanism of simultaneous removal of Hg0, SO2 and NO from flus gas using NaClO2 solution.
    Zhao Y, Ma X, Liu S, Yao J.
    Environ Technol; 2009 Mar; 30(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 19438060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bromine chloride as an oxidant to improve elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas.
    Qu Z, Yan N, Liu P, Chi Y, Jia J.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov 15; 43(22):8610-5. PubMed ID: 20028060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Spray scrubbing of the nitrogen oxides into NaClO2 solution under acidic conditions.
    Chien TW, Chu H, Hsueh HT.
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2001 Nov 15; 36(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 11413827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Economics of an integrated approach to control SO2, NOX, HCl, and particulate emissions from power plants.
    Shemwell BE, Ergut A, Levendis YA.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 May 15; 52(5):521-34. PubMed ID: 12022692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of NOx control processes on mercury speciation in utility flue gas.
    Richardson C, Machalek T, Miller S, Dene C, Chang R.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Aug 15; 52(8):941-7. PubMed ID: 12184693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Simultaneous control of Hg0, SO2, and NOx by novel oxidized calcium-based sorbents.
    Ghorishi SB, Singer CF, Jozewicz WS, Sedman CB, Srivastava RK.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Mar 15; 52(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 11924858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The impact of wet flue gas desulfurization scrubbing on mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations.
    Niksa S, Fujiwara N.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jul 15; 55(7):970-7. PubMed ID: 16111136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mercury re-emission in flue gas multipollutants simultaneous absorption system.
    Liu Y, Wang Q, Mei R, Wang H, Weng X, Wu Z.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec 02; 48(23):14025-30. PubMed ID: 25360573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Flue gas desulfurization: the state of the art.
    Srivastava RK, Jozewicz W.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Dec 02; 51(12):1676-88. PubMed ID: 15666473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) installations on emission characteristics of PM2.5 from coal-fired power plants equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR).
    Li Z, Jiang J, Ma Z, Fajardo OA, Deng J, Duan L.
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Nov 02; 230():655-662. PubMed ID: 28715770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Purification of Hg0 from flue gas by wet oxidation method and its mechanism: a review.
    Xing Y, Yan B, Lu P, Cui X, Li L, Wang M.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Dec 02; 24(34):26310-26323. PubMed ID: 29063396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Mercury oxidation promoted by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst under simulated Powder River Basin coal combustion conditions.
    Lee CW, Serre SD, Zhao Y, Lee SJ, Hastings TW.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Apr 02; 58(4):484-93. PubMed ID: 18422035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Investigation of selective catalytic reduction impact on mercury speciation under simulated NOx emission control conditions.
    Lee CW, Srivastava RK, Ghorishi SB, Hastings TW, Stevens FM.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Dec 02; 54(12):1560-6. PubMed ID: 15648394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The importance of the location of sodium chlorite application in a multipollutant flue gas cleaning system.
    Krzyzynska R, Hutson ND.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Jun 02; 62(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 22788109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Regenerable cobalt oxide loaded magnetosphere catalyst from fly ash for mercury removal in coal combustion flue gas.
    Yang J, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Zheng C.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec 16; 48(24):14837-43. PubMed ID: 25403026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of solution pH on SO2, NO(x), and Hg removal from simulated coal combustion flue gas in an oxidant-enhanced wet scrubber.
    Krzyzynska R, Hutson ND.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Feb 16; 62(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 22442937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of temperature and SO3 on re-emission of mercury from activated carbon under flue gas conditions.
    Royko M, Galloway B, Meeks ND, Padak B.
    J Environ Sci (China); 2019 May 16; 79():67-73. PubMed ID: 30784465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.