These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 3218500

  • 1. [Evaluation of and trends in hearing surveillance programs in industry].
    Malchaire J.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 3218500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Noise-induced hearing loss: are health service surveillance programs always effective?].
    Perbellini L, Veronese N, Raineri E, Rava M, Riolfi A.
    Med Lav; 2009; 100 Suppl 1():20-3. PubMed ID: 19848096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM, Colligan MJ, Stephenson CM, Bischoff BJ.
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Medical surveillance of occupational hearing loss].
    Idoate Carvajal M.
    Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr); 1990; 64(11-12):599-612. PubMed ID: 2151868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Audiometric surveillance of occupational environment].
    Kolstad HA, Rasmussen K.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Mar 12; 163(11):1557-60. PubMed ID: 11268809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Standard threshold shift criteria. An investigation of the most reliable indicator of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lane CL, Dobie RA, Crawford DR, Morgan MS.
    J Occup Med; 1985 Jan 12; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 3968596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss.
    Hétu R.
    J Occup Med; 1979 Apr 12; 21(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 438914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [A computerized system for the protection of the hearing of workers exposed to noise].
    Sliwińska-Kowalska M, Sułkowski W, Jurewicz B, Chrześcijanek M.
    Med Pr; 1992 Apr 12; 43(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 1453943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Noise and hearing loss in firefighting.
    Tubbs RL.
    Occup Med; 1995 Apr 12; 10(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 8903753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Extended high frequency audiometry in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss].
    Somma G, Coppeta L, Magrini A, Parrella M, Cappelletti MC, Gardi S, Messina M, Bergamaschi A, Italcementi Group Bergamo.
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007 Apr 12; 29(3 Suppl):258-60. PubMed ID: 18409674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The otologic referral criteria for occupational hearing conservation programs. Medical Aspects of noise Committee. American Council of Otolaryngology.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug 12; 12(3):635-6. PubMed ID: 471508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers.
    Ologe FE, Olajide TG, Nwawolo CC, Oyejola BA.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Aug 12; 122(8):786-94. PubMed ID: 17666128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Our audiometric criteria for the prevention of occupational hearing disorders].
    Tománek R, Sedlmajerová D.
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1983 Jul 12; 32(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 6627462
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Role of the Professional Supervisor in the Audiometric Testing Component of Hearing Conservation Programs.
    Mirza RA, Kirchner DB, ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss.
    J Occup Environ Med; 2018 Sep 12; 60(9):e502-e506. PubMed ID: 30095586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards.
    Lankford JE, Perrone DC, Thunder TD.
    AAOHN J; 1999 Apr 12; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Dosimetric evaluation of noise and results of the audiometric examination of a selected group of workers in the refinery-petrochemical industry].
    Latkowski B, Zalewski P, Sułkowski W, Puzio J.
    Med Pr; 1987 Apr 12; 38(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 3451021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: implications for hearing conservation program design.
    Dobie RA.
    Laryngoscope; 1983 Jul 12; 93(7):906-27. PubMed ID: 6865627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H, Marion S, Teschke K.
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec 12; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Audiometric programs' value rising with hearing loss claims.
    Robinette MS.
    Occup Health Saf; 1984 Feb 12; ():23-4. PubMed ID: 6709248
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluating tinnitus in industrial hearing loss prevention programs.
    Steinmetz LG, Zeigelboim BS, Lacerda AB, Morata TC, Marques JM.
    Int Tinnitus J; 2008 Feb 12; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19205168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.