These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

224 related items for PubMed ID: 32185199

  • 1. Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Demircan S, Uretürk EU, Apaydın A, Şen S.
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2810763. PubMed ID: 32185199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF, Grempel RG, Ambrosano GM, Passeri LA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
    Brasileiro BF, Grotta-Grempel R, Ambrosano GM, Passeri LA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.
    Sato FR, Asprino L, Noritomi PY, da Silva JV, de Moraes M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY, Hong J, Kim CS, Kim MJ.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Does adjunctive fixation in conjunction with miniplate affect condylar position and morphology after mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy? A retrospective 3-dimensional CT comparative study.
    Al-Watary MQ, Telha WA, Ge H, Wu Y, Sun X, Qing Z, Li J.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 38627189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of stress distribution in resorbable screw fixation system: three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular setback surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Choi JP, Baek SH, Choi JY.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1104-9. PubMed ID: 20613578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of magnesium-based resorbable metallic screw system in a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy model using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lee JY, Lee JW, Pang KM, Kim HE, Kim SM, Lee JH.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 72(2):402.e1-13. PubMed ID: 24280169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.