These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 32223291

  • 1. Functional tool actions in near and far space affect the distribution of visual attention along the tool.
    Park GD, Reed CL.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):388-404. PubMed ID: 32223291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.
    Park GD, Reed CL.
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2977-88. PubMed ID: 26126805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. To the end! Distribution of attention along a tool in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Park GD, Strom M, Reed CL.
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 227(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 23712683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Visual processing is biased in peripersonal foot space.
    Stettler BA, Thomas LE.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):298-305. PubMed ID: 27739016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.
    Lane AR, Ball K, Smith DT, Schenk T, Ellison A.
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Feb; 34(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 22042759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Individual Differences in the Flexibility of Peripersonal Space.
    Hunley SB, Marker AM, Lourenco SF.
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 28219262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Near, yet so far: the effect of pictorial cues on spatial attention.
    Nicholls ME, Forte JD, Loetscher T, Orr CA, Yates MJ, Bradshaw JL.
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 21616572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.
    Matheson HE, Thompson-Schill SL.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):441-457. PubMed ID: 30816789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The independence of endogenous attentional orienting and object individuation.
    Goodhew SC.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 31343246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Age-related changes in attentional reference frames for peripersonal space.
    Bloesch EK, Davoli CC, Abrams RA.
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 23426891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC, Lawrence M, Eskes GA, Klein R.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):869-78. PubMed ID: 19154749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C, Cardinali L, Pavani F, Farnè A.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):796-802. PubMed ID: 19837102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reduced temporal fusion in near-hand space.
    Goodhew SC, Gozli DG, Ferber S, Pratt J.
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):891-900. PubMed ID: 23599307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Visual perceptual learning is effective in the illusory far but not in the near space.
    Zafarana A, Farnè A, Tamè L.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1206-1215. PubMed ID: 37932577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM, Breitmeyer BG, Leighty KA, Denney HI.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C, Pavani F, Urquizar C, Cardinali L, Farnè A.
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul 01; 20(10):913-7. PubMed ID: 19512951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Slower attentional disengagement but faster perceptual processing near the hand.
    Thomas T, Sunny MM.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar 01; 174():40-47. PubMed ID: 28147264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The influence of anxiety and attentional focus on visual search during adaptive gait.
    Ellmers TJ, Young WR.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun 01; 45(6):697-714. PubMed ID: 31120299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Holmes NP, Spence C, Hansen PC, Mackay CE, Calvert GA.
    PLoS One; 2008 Jun 01; 3(10):e3502. PubMed ID: 18958150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S, Ford PR, Smeeton NJ.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May 01; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.