These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

146 related items for PubMed ID: 32229162

  • 1. The reliability and validity of the modified Unified Classification System for periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
    Fan MQ, Fan XH, Chen XL, Shen JJ, Jiang XJ, Li XS, Huang JF.
    J Orthop Sci; 2021 May; 26(3):385-388. PubMed ID: 32229162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
    Naqvi GA, Baig SA, Awan N.
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1047-50. PubMed ID: 22425302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
    Huang JF, Chen JJ, Shen JJ, Du WX, Liu FC, Tong PJ.
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2016 Aug; 82(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 27682284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems.
    Jain S, Mohrir G, Townsend O, Lamb JN, Palan J, Aderinto J, Pandit H.
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Aug; 103-B(8):1339-1344. PubMed ID: 34334039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reliability and Validity of the Vancouver Classification in Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cementless Femoral Stems.
    Lee S, Kagan R, Wang L, Doung YC.
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S277-S281. PubMed ID: 30922672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement.
    Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP.
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 10654463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Higher reliability and validity of Baba classification with computerised tomography imaging and implant information for periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Baba T, Homma Y, Ochi H, Kobayashi H, Matsumoto M, Sakamoto Y, Kuwahara H, Maeda K, Kaneko K.
    Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1695-9. PubMed ID: 25603973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Validity and reliability of the Unified Classification System applied to periprosthetic femur fractures: a comparison with the Vancouver system.
    De Meo D, Zucchi B, Castagna V, Pieracci EM, Mangone M, Calistri A, Persiani P, Villani C.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1375-1381. PubMed ID: 32468914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures.
    Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Dec; 90(12):1576-9. PubMed ID: 19043127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Simultaneous Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur and the Acetabulum After Bipolar Hip Arthroplasty.
    Verettas DA, Chloropoulou PP, Drosos G, Vogiatzaki T, Tilkeridis K, Kazakos K.
    Am J Case Rep; 2016 Dec 22; 17():973-976. PubMed ID: 28003639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. New classification focusing on implant designs useful for setting therapeutic strategy for periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Baba T, Homma Y, Momomura R, Kobayashi H, Matsumoto M, Futamura K, Mogami A, Kanda A, Morohashi I, Kaneko K.
    Int Orthop; 2015 Jan 22; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25091328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of available classification systems.
    Kuhn MZ, King JJ, Wright TW, Farmer KW, Levy JC, Hao KA, Wallace A, Patrick M.
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct 22; 31(10):2034-2042. PubMed ID: 35562034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reliability of Current Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Fractures of the Humerus.
    Auran RL, Tran TL, Dehghan N, McKee MD, Lederman ES.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2023 Feb 01; 37(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 36155598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study.
    Liu B, Ma W, Li H, Wu T, Huo J, Han Y.
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul 01; 34(7):1400-1411. PubMed ID: 30956049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Huang JF, Shen JJ, Chen JJ, Zheng Y, Du WX, Liu FC, Tong PJ.
    Int Orthop; 2015 Sep 01; 39(9):1765-9. PubMed ID: 26105767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].
    Pavelka T, Salášek M, Weisová D.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017 Sep 01; 84(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 28253947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Radiological Evaluation of Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures.
    Nowak M, Kusz D, Wilk R.
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2015 Oct 01; 17(5):489-500. PubMed ID: 26751749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.